Anonymous asked in Social ScienceAnthropology · 2 months ago

Are their superior races of men and lesser races of men??????

10 Answers

  • ?
    Lv 6
    3 weeks ago

    Race is a man made concept, there is differences in human complexion just how you have retrievers with yellow, brown or black fur. 


    The Soliga tribe has more genetic diversity than nations, pointing to early humans settling in the region and then spreading. Throughout the eons outer looks changed but dna does not lie. 


    As for the IQ comment, IQ tests take into account education which is subjective to nation and territories. White people in Germany have better access to education than white people in Siberia. Black people in Bermuda have access to better education than black people in Somalia. 


    It's also a fallacy to associate intelligence to a simple methodology. Many average people rate a lot higher than Albert Einstein on the IQ test, i even met a teenager who couldn't wipe his own butt, but ranked higher than Einstein on that test lol

  • 1 month ago

    Only ones that come to mind are the lower evolved "Clintonoids" and the "Trumpanzees".

  • 2 months ago

    The anonymous comment (first one) makes sense but he focuses only on physical human attributes. The humans with the largest brain and highest IQ takes the gold medal in my book. There is plenty of evidence the Asian population have the highest IQ, followed by Europeans etc... The smartest humans will be the most adaptable regardless of their physical limitations. EX: An Asian might not run as fast as an African. However, the Asian would create an artificial object (a machine) to arrive at a destination faster. Make sense?

    You may Google IQs of the world. Its indisputable each race comes with different IQs. It doesnt mean one race is better than another. It just means throughout the last100,000 years we developed independently as our environment dictated. (diet, weather, terrain...) 

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    Well every race except Africans have subhuman dna such as neanderthals and denisivons 

  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 2 months ago

    No - just humans in all our variety. 

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    Different populations are adapted to different local environments. Adaptation for one environment makes one less well adapted to another environment. For example, adaptations to a hot environment means that one can more easily die of hypothermia. Adaptation to cold climate makes one more susceptible to skin cancer and to heat strokes. Adaptation to some environments make one stronger, but a more muscular person is not as good a long distance runner. How many weight lifters run the marathon, for example. Most marathon runners are skinny. Most sprinters are muscular. Is a long distance runner or a sprinter "superior?"  Some populations of humans have larger brains but they may not be as strong physically or as skilled athletically. Is a bookworm superior or a star athlete superior? Is Albert Einstein better than Michael Jordan or is it vice versa?  Is Michael Jordan better or is Pele better? Jordan won 6 NBA titles but Pele won 3 World Cup soccer titles. 

    Therefore it is not possible to say which race is superior because there is no objective standard of what is good vs. what is bad.  One may think that being tall is superior, but scientific studies show that tall people live about 10 years less than short people, regardless of which country one is from. So, is it better to live longer or is it better to be taller? Who decides what is superior and what is inferior? In fact, because there is no objective standard, a man can say he is superior to another, stronger man because he is smarter, but then he can claim that he is superior to a woman who is smarter than he is by saying that he is stronger. Biologists point out that there is no single gene or trait that is universally superior or fittest Because of that we cannot point to any human population and say that it is the most superior.

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    Most mammals have light skin that is covered by fur, and biologists believe that EARLY HUMAN ANCESTORS started out this way also. Dark skin probably evolved after humans lost their body fur, because the naked skin was vulnerable to the strong UV radiation. We all came from pale skinned Africans. Lucy had pale skin under her body hair. So did H.Erectus, Denisovans and Neanderthals. We all came from pale skinned Africans. So humanity literally wouldn't exist without white skinned people. It's obvious black people are INFERIOR and White people are SUPERIOR.  💪🏻

  • Zirp
    Lv 7
    2 months ago

    Nope. As Ricardo says, we are all one-and-the-same race

  • 2 months ago

    Nope. Humanity, ALL of it, is one species.

  • 2 months ago

    No, because there aren't races of men, we're all Homo sapiens sapiens. 

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.