What did judge brann say?
everywhere in between. In other words, Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise
almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which
a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms
of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated. One might expect that when
seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with
compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this
Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief
despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
- 5 days ago
That's usually an attempt to see if some judge might not use their judgment
and decided insanity over rules reality . They're republicans who are also judges at times so
the Orange con thinks that means loyalty . 1st time in court for Giuliani in 30 years