Is Darwins EvolutionTheory root cause of Atheism 21st Century? How the confusion started & affected scientist,biologist,intelectual minds ?


It is similarity of human &Monkey Face. Evolution is a chunk strucked in middle of large intestine neither go back or come forward. Evolution theory fail to explain an exact picture of origin or end of species.Origin of species not in similarity (evolution) but in singularity(religion).

Update 2:

Similarity of species human and monkey face is creation of God. similarity  does not depend on percentage of DNA structure in that case banana must look 60% like human face but banana is Not. banana has 60 percent human DNA

Update 3:

Are you affected infected by evolution theory?There is a cure, Say I believe ib God Almihjty My God is eternal not affected by Time.  Time is illusion A relative standard (Einstein) Evolution is based on time, thus Evolution is illusion or invalid

Update 4:

."Looook" Watch out" what Richard Dawkins a british biologist, an evolution scientist saying “Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.”I am my own god. Richard Dawkins is actualy confirming God in his own self like pharooh of anciant Egypt,

so Existance of God cannot be denied,

37 Answers

  • Otto
    Lv 7
    3 weeks ago

     Yes it is a part of it.

  • Carym
    Lv 6
    4 weeks ago

    The Bible and evolution cannot BOTH be true.

    Evolution is a LIE!

    We should not forget that the basic premise behind the evolutionary world-view, is atheistic. Evolutionists have been brainwashed, to believe the LIE. If atheism and Darwinism and materialism are true, there’s no point to anything at all---that’s all they can believe---nothing more. "A dead-end!"

    But because our 'souls' are endless (it has a beginning, but no end), we can expect the consequences to be the same, and that is something they have to deal with... (rather now than in the afterlife). 

    To pretend that the soul does not exist is to deny and deceive oneself. "Life" itself is resident in one's consciousness; life outside of consciousness is mechanical, for heaven's sake! How can any of these have an ideology to go with it? How did things get so completely out of proportion?

    Now Darwin's theory is commonly accepted as a scientific fact, not for any real evidence, we might add. When will they ever come to the perfect realization that 'FAITH' can be measured and understood by the 'Cause and Effect; Means and Ends; Seed and Fruit,' principles? These cannot be separated because the Effect already blooms in the Cause, while the End pre-exists in the Means and the Fruit is always in the Seed.

  • Anonymous
    4 weeks ago

    Please for heaven's sake don't blame Darwin for atheism.As long as theism is there atheism also will be there. Thank God he has given us brain to think and find out the truth .Man will continue to use the brain given by the Lord  eternally

  • 4 weeks ago

    It is time for students of the evolutionary process, especially those who have been misquoted and used by the creationists, to state clearly that evolution is a fact, not theory, and that what is at issue within biology are questions of details of the process and the relative importance of different mechanisms of evolution. It is a fact that the earth with liquid water, is more than 3.6 billion years old. It is a fact that cellular life has been around for at least half of that period and that organized multicellular life is at least 800 million years old. It is a fact that major life forms now on earth were not at all represented in the past. There were no birds or mammals 250 million years ago. It is a fact that major life forms of the past are no longer living. There used to be dinosaurs and Pithecanthropus, and there are none now. It is a fact that all living forms come from previous living forms. Therefore, all present forms of life arose from ancestral forms that were different. Birds arose from nonbirds and humans from nonhumans. No person who pretends to any understanding of the natural world can deny these facts any more than she or he can deny that the earth is round, rotates on its axis, and revolves around the sun.

    The controversies about evolution lie in the realm of the relative importance of various forces in molding evolution.

    - R. C. Lewontin "Evolution/Creation Debate: A Time for Truth" Bioscience 31, 559 (1981) reprinted in Evolution versus Creationism, op cit.

    Attachment image
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • Phil M
    Lv 7
    4 weeks ago

    The fact that I don't believe in a higher power has nothing to do with evolution. You suck at this.

  • Tom
    Lv 7
    4 weeks ago

    You can be BOTH a Christian (Methodist) AND a SCIENTIST, like me (Geologist)---I see no conflict between scripture and Science---only  some outdated FUNDY INTERPRETATION of scripture and Science----The first few books of Genesis are ALEGORICAL STORIES with a lesson----"WHO is ultimately responsible for Mankind and the animals (God) "----It does NOT cover HOW he did it.---that part is for us Scientists.  Parts of the Bible are NOT to be taken literally, but interpreted in terms of what else we know to be true today.-------The Bible is all true, but does not contain all Truth.  God gave us "the book of nature" (Science and observation) and a brain to fill in other stuff if we are curious beyond the needs of Scripture.

  • 4 weeks ago

    No.  Pride is.  Even arrogance.

    People pay attention to atheistic evolution only because it gives them an excuse not to believe in God, not for any merit of the theory itself.  The facts do not support atheistic evolution.  Its trends are to weakness, disease, and death, not to life and diversity.  Only one mutation in 100 is even weakly beneficial.  Strongly beneficial mutations, advantageous enough to select for, are even rarer.  Half of all mutations are fatal.  The rest are debilitating.  If you insist on evolution, you have to admit God.

  • 4 weeks ago

    On rare occasions a human turns out to have not just a monkey face but also a monkey brain.  Even more rarely, a human turns out to have a banana brain.  Perhaps you can obtain help from a local grocer.

  • Paul
    Lv 7
    4 weeks ago

    There is absolutely no conflict between true science and true religion. Truth cannot conflict with truth. Jesus Christ founded one Church, said it was to remain one, and promised that one Church that it would teach the fullness of God's truth until the end of time. Which is why the teaching of that one Church (which includes well over half of all Christians) never conflicts with natural truths revealed by science. In Protestantism, the teaching of each denomination conflicts with the teaching of the 6,000 other denominations. Since truth cannot conflict with truth, a tremendous amount of untruth is obviously being taught in such manmade churches. So it is no surprise that some of these false teachings also conflict with natural truths clearly revealed by science.

  • Barney
    Lv 6
    4 weeks ago

    (2 Corinthians 4:3, 4) If, in fact, the good news we declare is veiled, it is veiled among those who are perishing, 4 among whom the god of this system of things has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, so that the illumination of the glorious good news about the Christ, who is the image of God, might not shine through.

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.