Is Queen a Beatles ripoff?
- Fell In LoveLv 71 month ago
Far from it, they're a very original band that rocks.
- conley39Lv 71 month ago
No, they aren't a Beatles rip-off.
- JimLv 51 month ago
You obviously never listened to Queens' music. They were harder edged than the Beatles. Both had great harmonies but I believe Queen were more versatile.
- KillmousekyLv 71 month ago
No. The Beatles clearly influenced music done by others simultaneously & after them, just as they were influenced by others simultaneously & before them. Still, it's hilarious to read "Sad Eyed" contend that Queen was a better live band.
- What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
- 1 month ago
They were obviously very influenced by The Beatles but equally as influenced by The Beach Boys, Bowie and Led Zeppelin. So no they were just as unique as The Beatles and as a live band absolutely surpassed them.
- 1 month ago
Not at all. Queen is a theatrical rock and roll group, and the The Beatles are more of a British bluegrass (Skiffle) influenced pop/rock outfit. Where Queen wanted to create songs that invoke power, glory and elegant flamboyance, The Beatles were essentially a crooning quartet that happened to play instruments and write their own music.
- OliveLv 71 month ago
No not hardly. Altogether different style of music