Were the Rams better off in St. Louis?

Are the Rams better off being known as St. Louis Rams than Los Angeles Rams? 

10 Answers

  • 1 month ago

    No, they were not.

  • 1 month ago

    Los Angeles, St. Louis is too small of a market

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    Yes because the Coronavirus is not as bad in St. Louis as it is in Los Angeles. 

  • F
    Lv 6
    2 months ago

    I’m sure there’s plenty of sheep for the whole USA.

  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 2 months ago

    They were better as the Cleveland Rams in the '30s and '40s.

  • Kathy
    Lv 7
    2 months ago

    In my opinion, no.

  • Mier
    Lv 5
    2 months ago

    No, ridiculous question. Everything about the rams in LA makes far better sense both performance wise and business wise than if they were in St. Louis . 

  • 2 months ago

    They were the Los Angeles Rams for 50 years before they moved to St. Louis.


    Bone Alone, no judgement of your assertion, merely some facts.


    Kroenke  grew up and lived in Missouri when he bought the Cardinals. Frontierre moved the Rams to St. Louis for the same reason Kroenke  moved the team to L.A., no new stadium. 


    During his ownership, prior to moving to L.A., Kroenke had had about he same average attendance as Frontierre did during her ownership in St. Louis. Rams attendance was on a big downward trend when Kroenke bought the team. He does have a new stadium for which he paid.


    Neither had very good overall success during their periods of ownership, Kroenke, .346, .688 by McVay, Frontierre .472. Both had/have less than stellar reputes with other NFL owners.

  • 2 months ago

    Being the most popular NFL team in the LA market in a brand new stadium is much better than being in St Louis.  There's not much question about that.

  • 2 months ago

    Only if Stan kroenke wasn’t the owner. Georgia frontierre was a much better owner. 

    All kroenke has done was run the rams to the ground so that he has a reason to move it back to L.A.  (lack of attendance). Jeff fisher is an average coach at best. He has a losing record before he became the rams coach and he still has a losing record after getting fired. How many coaches are still coaches after several losing seasons. 

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.