Should people who have bad genetic be banned from procreating ?
- D gLv 72 months agoFavourite answer
Those with genetic Stupidity should
We could start with taking warnings off plastic bags .
Don't put over your head
If we take away the Don't it will eliminate the really stupid
- JimLv 72 months ago
I think Hitler tried that...
- CRRLv 72 months ago
It's called Eugenics and it's been tried in the USA with compulsory sterilization in 50 states.
- MattLv 52 months ago
You should specify exactly what you mean by 'bad genetics' in any future idea.
If you meant "hereditary vulnerabily to serious diseases and ailmemts regardless of race/gender." then you might have an argument to bring to the table. Even then i whould think outright banning them is opressive. Those people should be respectfully encouraged to seek other options at most. (adoption, concenting sterilization, surrogate parent ect.. )
- What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
- FLv 62 months ago
While I wouldn’t go that far, it does seem that the more unsuitable someone is for looking after children, the more they have.
If Darwin is right, the human race is selectively breeding morons.
- CowboyLv 62 months ago
of course not - who the hell could make those distinctions?
- RichardLv 62 months ago
That didn't work out too well for the Nazis...
- MARKLv 72 months ago
Yes, sure you should have been.
- rustbucketLv 62 months ago
At the very least people like you with good genetics should be banned from procreating.
- PAMELALv 72 months ago
And how would you go about that then, have a person in the bedroom each night with them to make sure that they put a condom on?