Mr TE asked in EnvironmentGlobal Warming · 8 months ago

Climate change deniers, What do you have to say to the peer-reviewed evidence?

13 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    8 months ago
    Favourite answer

    Right wing media has brainwashed them into thinking it's 'fake news' and part of a huge conspiracy going on in the world's scientific community like never seen before in the history of modern science.

    Yeah, they are really that ridiculous. I wouldn't be surprised if they don't even know what Modern Science is.

  • 8 months ago

    First of all, the consensus is not science. 

    Secondly, there are a lot of white papers that are never reviewed. In some cases, his is good for they are worthless. In some cases, when it is not accepted because it does not go along with the judges' agenda, this is horrible. 

    Thirdly, a lot of these papers are written to propagandize a particular agenda. These are usually sponsored by people like Soros, Steyers, Gore and the like. 

    Fourthly, there is the fact that many writers write these papers only to be recognized as an authority. So many times you see that this person wrote so many 'peer-reviewed' papers so they must be considered an expert. 

    In real life scientist who can DO! If a scientist can't he writes peer-reviewed papers. 

    Basically, the computer is a 'white paper' for it puts the scientist's thoughts in action. Computer models have so far been proven wrong in the field of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Change. A fact that no one can deny.

    Quote by Chris Folland of UK Meteorological Office: “The data don't matter. We're not basing our recommendations [for reductions in carbon dioxide emissions] upon the data. We're basing them upon the climate models.”

  • JimZ
    Lv 7
    8 months ago

    The only people that deny climate change are leftist ideologues that suggest climate was stable before humans began emitting CO2.  They are wrong and idiots, the useful idiots, that Lenin needed to push his evil hate filled agenda. Modern leftists are in the same ilk as Vladimir except Vlad probably actually loved his country.      

  • Dale-E
    Lv 7
    8 months ago

    Their new boss has been an activist and is taking a supposed pay cut to be at the top. So with a subsidized ax to grind, their scientific trust has become officially politicized.

  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    NASA can't even convert units correctly but you're willing to believe them on climate change?

      

    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1999-oct-0...

  • 8 months ago

    I'm not into skewed cherry picked peer reviewed evidence, I'm more interested in the overall facts

  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    I have no doubt climate change is real. It’s been happening for 4.5 billion years 

       Why is when it comes to evolution it goes back to the start of life almost 3 billions year ago, but when it comes to climate change it’s only a hundred years for many.

        NASA is corrupt btw 

        

  • Mike
    Lv 7
    8 months ago

    Pal  reviewed evidence not tested

  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    97 percent scam has been debunked a million times over. NASA and NOAA tamper with data in order to promote the agw scam. Weak minded people are easily fooled. 

  • 8 months ago

    Where is the peer (pal) reviewed science?

     All you produced are references that have data manipulated graphs, he says (hearsay) and more biased information. There is no experimental peer reviewed scientific documentation. The hoax and its politically biased reporting, exposed data manipulation (climategate) has destroyed any integrity for climate science in "peer reviewed" documentation. So much so it is referred to as, Pal Review.Do you really believe that the forces of Naturally occurring climate events can be controlled by humans?

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.