Do you want Trump to get a fair trial like Clinton had, or do you just want him to be immediately found "not guilty" so the GOP ...?

... will have to explain why they possibly let a criminal go free?

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 4 weeks ago

    The trial is rigged and it don't matter what nobody thinks bout it. Itr won't change.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 4 weeks ago

    Clinton was convicted of an actual crime - perjury - so why did He go free? Other people go to prison for perjury.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 4 weeks ago

    Well, a fair trial for what? There hasn't even been a crime committed. The Articles even admit to that fact. So, what is President Trump being tried for, exactly? That's what makes this whole thing such a political farce.

    For the record, I disagreed with Clinton's impeachment, as well. While it may be in incredibly poor taste, getting a teenager to perform oral sex on you in the Oval Office hardly rises to the level of high crimes. 

    • ...Show all comments
    • BlackAdder
      Lv 7
      4 weeks agoReport

      Alex, thank you for your admission. So, you're saying that an American can be accused, tried and convicted for the sin...not the crime...of opposing your political agenda? Do I have it straight? Have you REALLY thought about the ramifications? And you can't convict someone of a 'supposed' crime.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 4 weeks ago

    We've already seen the case the Democrats presented . It has no merit .

    I vote to acquit .

    • ...Show all comments
    • BlackAdder
      Lv 7
      4 weeks agoReport

      Why would he need to go to law school. NO LAW was broken. The Articles openly ADMIT that, you fool. You don't need to be a lawyer to see the problem with that. 

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • Anonymous
    4 weeks ago

    Even if there was a video of Trump telling Giuliani that he extorted Ukraine in order to get them to help him cheat in the election, Trump supporters would say "nothing to see here, no evidence at all."

    • abdul
      Lv 7
      4 weeks agoReport

      But there isn't any of that sort of nonsense though is there.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • Rick
    Lv 7
    4 weeks ago

    The Democrats never had to explain why they let a criminal go free.

    • abdul
      Lv 7
      4 weeks agoReport

      They did. Feinstein made a speech saying they chose to acquit him because he was trying to protect his family.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • y
    Lv 7
    4 weeks ago

    Senate did not even allow Clinton's confession to be added into the proceedings. Becouse it came after the house had wrapped up.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • abdul
    Lv 7
    4 weeks ago

    Hah! You mean like the "fair trial" he got in the house? Secret witnesses, whistle blowers, and a guilty vote split right down party lines?

    • ...Show all comments
    • abdul
      Lv 7
      4 weeks agoReport

      You can call it whatever you like al, but they subpoenaed witnesses, they took sworn testimony, and they voted on a verdict.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 4 weeks ago

    Do you know of any evidence.  Please tell us. No one else can find any.

    • ...Show all comments
    • atheist
      Lv 6
      4 weeks agoReport

      Asking someone to look into democratic corruption is illegal only in socalist countries.  Not America. 

    • Log in to reply to the answers
Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.