Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentElections · 8 months ago

Now can we impeach Trump? How clearly did the 3 constitutional scholars explain why we MUST impeach?

11 Answers

Relevance
  • 8 months ago
    Favourite answer

    They were abundantly clear. 

    The 3 expert  scholars were crystal clear on why this is important and why he should be impeached. 

    Even the 4th expert did not totally disagree.......but repeated the republican  BS  about "rushing the process".....despite Trump's every effort to delay it. 

    They whined about not hearing from the most important witnesses......the ones Trump forbade from Testifying.  He instructed others to IGNORE subpeona's and then they cry that the LAW isn't being respected here. 

    All I heard out of cons  was  "Hommina Hommina Hommina"   while the 3 experts, were clear, concise, well spoken and accurately laid out their case, convincingly. 

    It is clear to a blind person,  articles of Impeachment are merited. 

  • James
    Lv 5
    8 months ago

    There are more scholarly minds about law living on the sidewalks of Los Angeles . 

  • 8 months ago

    God, Help the President in underserved overserved overall ways let’s understand our President in all the good things he does! In Jesus name Amen 

  • Foofa
    Lv 7
    8 months ago

    Contact your Senators and ask them to vote for impeachment when this moves to the Senate.

  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 8 months ago

    LOL!................................. Won't happen.

  • 8 months ago

    It was extraordinarily clear and concise, though Republicans deny the importance of their testimony, pleading it as here-say and irrelevant.

  • Clive
    Lv 7
    8 months ago

    What does this have to do with elections?

  • 8 months ago

    liberal trump haters

  • y
    Lv 7
    8 months ago

    You mean the three partisan hacks who brought in their own opinions as opposed to citing factual laws. One even went with the colluding with Russia line which has never been proved. That reinforces that it is a political hack job as opposed to law.

  • 8 months ago

    3 extremely liberal, politically biased lawyers that ignored the inconvenient facts.

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.