Now can we impeach Trump? How clearly did the 3 constitutional scholars explain why we MUST impeach?
- Weasel McWeaselLv 78 months agoFavourite answer
They were abundantly clear.
The 3 expert scholars were crystal clear on why this is important and why he should be impeached.
Even the 4th expert did not totally disagree.......but repeated the republican BS about "rushing the process".....despite Trump's every effort to delay it.
They whined about not hearing from the most important witnesses......the ones Trump forbade from Testifying. He instructed others to IGNORE subpeona's and then they cry that the LAW isn't being respected here.
All I heard out of cons was "Hommina Hommina Hommina" while the 3 experts, were clear, concise, well spoken and accurately laid out their case, convincingly.
It is clear to a blind person, articles of Impeachment are merited.
- JamesLv 58 months ago
There are more scholarly minds about law living on the sidewalks of Los Angeles .
- Fred XX00 ILv 78 months ago
God, Help the President in underserved overserved overall ways let’s understand our President in all the good things he does! In Jesus name Amen
- FoofaLv 78 months ago
Contact your Senators and ask them to vote for impeachment when this moves to the Senate.
- What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
- Beverly SLv 78 months ago
LOL!................................. Won't happen.
- wind_updollLv 78 months ago
It was extraordinarily clear and concise, though Republicans deny the importance of their testimony, pleading it as here-say and irrelevant.
- CliveLv 78 months ago
What does this have to do with elections?
- pit bulls biteLv 78 months ago
liberal trump haters
- yLv 78 months ago
You mean the three partisan hacks who brought in their own opinions as opposed to citing factual laws. One even went with the colluding with Russia line which has never been proved. That reinforces that it is a political hack job as opposed to law.
- Justin ThymeLv 78 months ago
3 extremely liberal, politically biased lawyers that ignored the inconvenient facts.