Why do Democrats continue to pretend Sondland didn't admit he presumed everything even after I post the link to him doing so in the hearing?
Are they afraid of the truth?
- MercuriLv 73 weeks ago
Did you even bother to read the link you posted? No one saying that Sondland didn't presume about the foreign aid. That doesn't mean everything else he said wasn't true. Try again, with less desperation this time.
- LeoLv 73 weeks ago
The question is an incoherent mess.
- SallyLv 73 weeks ago
You guys always want to pick one tiny thing that you think proves something and ignore the huge body of evidence. Like a piece of lint on my sleeve means I'm the worst-dressed person on the planet.
- AlexanderLv 63 weeks ago
If someone says "there's a draft in the room", would it be wrong to presume that that person wants you to close the window? People do understand indirectness. It's not rocket science. In most cases there's not even plausible deniability.
- What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
- Raisin CaineLv 73 weeks ago
I find it hilarious that you actually post the evidence and leftists like Pearlmar, just say "because he didn't".
How these leftists have the audacity to pretend intellectual superiority is truly beyond me.
Weasel, Since YOU say that YOUR star witness is a liar, it seems to me that YOU are saying YOU have nothing on Trump.
- JeffreyLv 73 weeks ago
No, they are TERRIFIED of the truth.
- Anonymous3 weeks ago
"I know that members of this committee have frequently framed these complicated issues in the form of a simple question: Was there a 'quid pro quo?' As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes," Sondland said. And you can be sure: a guy who paid a million for an ambassadorship knows a thing or two about quid pro quos.
- Anonymous3 weeks ago
If Sondland really only "presumed everything" Trump and Giuliani wanted him to do, why did neither of those two ever ask him WTF he thought he was doing? Pray, tell.
- Weasel McWeaselLv 73 weeks ago
The problem is.......Sondland said BOTH things.
So depending which side of his two faced mouth he talked out of , that you like....
he said BOTH things , for BOTH sides.
His testimony was a mish mash of saying, yes it was quid pro quo and then, no it wasn't.
Yeah, thanks.......that was real helpful, claiming both things are true.
- Ryde,0nLv 73 weeks ago
Democrats have a limited attention span and poor comprehension . Seems not a single Lefty even knows Sondland walked back if not outright contradicted most of his morning ' testimony ' .