For a scientific poster what is the difference between the analysis and the results section?

I already have the three graphs. For the analysis section I have explained what each graph represents, and why that is, what would i then do for the results?? I need to show critical thinking as well (this is to do with climate change) so I was thinking of putting that into the analysis section.... would that be correct?

University level and im kinda dumb lmao

1 Answer

Relevance
  • 4 weeks ago

    For me I would just show the graphs in the result section with a title, axis label and probably other graph property such as line of best fit, legends, etc.

    Analysis section looks good.

    Critical thinking should be your conclusion. You need to justify whether the result supported your hypothesis or not. What went right or wrong in the experiment. And for the word count future studies/development.

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.