?
Lv 4
? asked in News & EventsOther - News & Events · 8 months ago

In 1914 why did UK send its poor, destitute to fight the Germans while accepting and paying for 200000 Belgian refugees fleeing the Germans?

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 8 months ago

    British, especially Scottish, are better soldiers wheras Belgian refugees can do works in order to support the front lines.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Ludwig
    Lv 6
    8 months ago

    In 1914 there was NO CONSCRIPTION. There was an army of VOLUNTEERS, like my grandfather. He and his friends were neither poor nor destitute, they were the educated working classes and patriots.

    ~

    His family TOOK IN BELGIAN REFUGEES, and visited them after the war.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    Because the elite who are predominantly Jews don't care about ordinary people and use them like porns in a chess game to be slaughtered. 

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    It was war and we welcomed refugees because it was the civilized thing to do

    England 'two world wars and one world cup do, dah dah

    Those cocky germens

    we Tommys said oi hun belts off trousers down time for a damn good thrashing

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 8 months ago

    The UK sent every man to fight the Germans, not just the poor and destitute. 

    • ?
      Lv 4
      8 months agoReport

      What about the 200000 Belgians fleeing the Germans that it took in?

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Biff
    Lv 7
    8 months ago

    I'm not sure the British soldiers were necessarily poor and destitute but I'm wondering if any of the male refugees went to back to mainland Europe to join them in fighting the Germans. Like the Poles did in WW2, some even forming a Polish RAF squadron.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Bob
    Lv 7
    8 months ago

    Because war is hell. 

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    Get over it. It was 105 years ago ffs.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Bob
    Lv 6
    8 months ago

    Maybe the Belgians didn’t have the weapons.

    Obviously not all would have fought and they need to be out of the way when the battleground is decided

    • ?
      Lv 4
      8 months agoReport

      The British conscripts did not have weapons before they were conscripted

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.