Can Pluto be reclassified as a planet?

I watched a recent episode of Nova on PBS where they too a closer look at Pluto and found that it had a lot of characteristics of being a planet. They even named a part of it after the man who originally discovered it.

Update:

Took* a closer look. (Sorry Typo)

Update 2:

What would Clyde Tombaugh say to the IAU if they had made Pluto a dwarf planet while he was still alive?

29 Answers

Relevance
  • 9 months ago
    Favourite answer

    You could always Picket the AIU

    I was them that demoted Pluto

    However, New Horizons has opened up people's minds

    Pluto is now a real world again

    Who would have thought from about 60 years ago that Pluto had five moons.

    One, Charon which is just slightly smaller than itself

    Not clearing its own Orbital Path was the only reason for its demotion

    A lack of Mass and being in the Kuiper Belt was its Failure

    Still interesting none the less

    Would you believe that underneath its Shell of Frozen Nitrogen there could be Liquid water above a Rocky Core

    Even there we have a chance of life

    When I was back at School, I am 60 now, Pluto was classified as a Planet

    And in 2006 New Horizons was launched actually before the AIU's decision

    Attachment image
  • 9 months ago

    The only planet that was not considered a planet, then got classified as a planet is... Earth.

    Until the 17th century, it was simply "the centre of the universe".

    Planets then included: Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. During the 17th century, 4 planets were added: Io, Europa, Ganymede, Callisto (that is how Galileo reported them, because they did fit, at the time, the description for "planet" even though they were in orbit around Jupiter, and not "Earth, the centre of the universe")

    In the 18th century (the 1700s), The Sun was promoted to "star", the Moon demoted to "satellite", along with the satellites of Jupiter. The biggest demotion was for Earth, passing from centre of the universe to planet.

    Early 19th century, four new planets were discovered (in orbit around the Sun): Ceres, Pallas, Juno and Vesta. They were, strangely, sharing similar orbits around the Sun, but all was OK until new telescopes, in the 1850s and 1860s, began to discover other similar planets by the dozen, all sharing a "belt" of orbits around the Sun.

    That is when the category "minor planets" was created. Ceres (and the other three) got "demoted" to minor planets.

    When Pluto got demoted to "dwarf planet", a new category invented to solve another problem, Ceres found itself reclassified to dwarf planet (making it a half-way promotion from minor planet to planet).

    Because of the upwards reclassification of Ceres (once reclassified downwards), it shows that there is some hope for Pluto.

    Not much, but some.

    The real problem is that Pluto was NOT created at the same time nor with the same process as the "main" planets.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 9 months ago

    I still consider it one. I don't discriminate agains dwarf planets. In fact I call them little planets.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    9 months ago

    Yes, but only if we DEMAND it. Write your Congressman and make them aware of this grave injustice!

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • Anonymous
    9 months ago

    They've classified it as a dwarf planet now. It's smaller than our Moon.

    They've also started classifying the major planets into different categories now too. Earth, Venus, Mars and Mercury are terrestrial planets. Neptune & Uranus are ice giant planets. Saturn and Jupiter are gas giant planets. We'll never get back to Pluto being part of the major planet club again.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 9 months ago

    The problem is that there are plenty of other bodies which would also count as planets if Pluto does, and the word would cease to be very useful.

    • Climate Realist
      Lv 7
      9 months agoReport

      BS

      The part about the word being useful.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Paula
    Lv 7
    9 months ago

    Yes it is possible.

    It is a spherical object - and it obits the sun directly

    It has not cleared its orbit of other similar sized objects.

    But it does have 5 moons.

    Those 5 moons elevate Pluto above all other dwarf planets.

    But it is hard to see IAU changing the rules again.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 9 months ago

    Yes it can........

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 9 months ago

    Pluto never wasn't a planet. The IAU added the new category 'dwarf planet' to describe Pluto. Pluto's moons,Charon, Nix, Styx, Hydra, Kerberos,

    Charon is not much less mass and nearly form a binary planet system, but none of Pluto's moons can be classed planet.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Clive
    Lv 7
    9 months ago

    There is a very clear definition of a planet laid down by the IAU. Pluto does not fit it. End of story.

    • Tom S
      Lv 7
      9 months agoReport

      End of story? ...... https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.space.com/amp/pluto-planet-debate-2019-alan-stern-iau.html

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.