Whose paying Nigel Farage to wreck Britain and why?
- BiffLv 79 months agoFavourite answer
Donors to the Brexit Party by Paypal can effectively remain anonymous and, as PayPal doesn't use capchas, can be automated. Multiple donations of £500 can be made anonymously to get round electoral law: https://bylinetimes.com/2019/05/14/brexit-party-do...
- RobertLv 69 months ago
Clearly that is not the view of those who voted for the Brexit Party in the European Elections:
The question reflects the Asker's apparent view that Britain should remain in the European Union. If one believes in democracy the will of the majority expressed in the British referendum on leaving the E.U., should be respected by putting it into action.
Brexit means Britain would leave the E.U. and it also ought to mean that it will be a sovereign country controlling its own trade, rather than what the E.U. wants: To continue to indefinitely control British trade.
One of the really bad provisions of E.U. membership on Britain is the E.U. free movement of labor. While many people in the E.U. countries speak English, British people tend not to speak other European.languages, leaving Britain at a disadvantage regarding British jobs taken by other E.U. citizens, compared with British citizens working in other E.U. countries. In fact, we now know that about twice as many E.U. citizens work in Britain compared with British citizens working in other E.U. countries:
December 2018, there were an estimated 2.27 million EU nationals working in the UK, see:
Just under 1.2 million UK nationals living in the rest of the EU, see within:
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson should comply with the new law delaying Brexit to accept its delay in leaving the European Union (its requirement to request a further extension of membership of the European Union beyond October 2019), but also ensure the British People are made well aware that the opposition in Parliament have been fully responsible for this delay, a delay for no apparent good reason.
Likewise since the opposition in the British Parliament have failed to authorise a snap general election which is needed for breaking the impasse in Parliament, Prime Minister Johnson should remind the British People who have been responsible for denying them it.
Myth promoted by the E.U.:
That the “backstop” aka E.U. “Customs Union” in effect E.U. control of British trade after Britain leaves the E.U., is for protecting the Northern Ireland “Good Friday peace agreement” by preventing a “hard” border in Ireland:
In reality the “backstop” is a device for keeping Britain imprisoned in the E.U. trade rules known as the E.U. “Customs Union”.
Yes there would be a sovereign-border in Ireland but Britain has made it quite clear there will be no “hard” border (no strict, or any, physical customs control). Though it will be a “sovereign” border, it will not be a “hard” border, and to emphasize this it could be named the “Friendship Border”.
If Britain is to be a sovereign country outside the E.U. it must be allowed to control its own trade.
Yes there will be some temporary “inconvenience” without a prior E.U. leaving-agreement, but you will see how the E.U will run to make a new agreement without including the E.U. “Customs Union”, were Britain to leave the E.U. without a prior agreement.
Remember the E.U. does a lot of trade with Britain and will not want potential levies on its exports to Britain.
Britain will only be able to obtain a good agreement (from Britain’s point of view) from the E.U., if it first leaves without a prior agreement.
Why really, did former British Prime Minister May sign an agreement locking Britain into E.U. trade rules for leaving the E.U.? In my view, because she is a “remainer” (believes Britain should remain in the E.U.).
Since the E.U. is primarily a trading block, staying in the E.U. “Customs Union” (aka E.U. trade regulations) amounts to never really having left the E.U., save for having no voting rights - No wonder E.U. officials appeared delighted with the signing of that agreement, and no wonder the British Parliament rejected it three times!
Faced with that agreement, perhaps it was considered British politicians would rather revoke Article 50 (the notice to leave the E.U.) to end Brexit.
Make no mistake: Opposition in the British Parliament against leaving “without an agreement”, is by those who oppose Britain leaving the E.U. and who disrespect the will of the British People expressed in the referendum. The only available current agreement locks Britain into the E.U. “Customs Union” (E.U. controlling British trade), an agreement which Parliament has rejected three times, and which the E.U. will not change while Britain remains in the E.U.
Misleading information is being promoted by the opposition in the British Parliament that the British Government has not been negotiating with the E.U. since Mr. Johnson became Prime Minister. That falsehood is a smokescreen to hide the fact that there is nothing (else) of significance, that could be negotiated with the E.U. other than the "backstop" (aka "Customs Union"), which the E.U. has made clear it will NOT negotiate! (In my view, the E.U. will not negotiate the "backstop" while Britain remains in the E.U.)
Here then is a my simulation of those meetings / telephone conversations, attempting negotiation with the E.U. on the "backstop":
Britain: "Please can we invite you to negotiate the "backstop?"
Ditto, etc. ...
“France 24 English” TV has been promoting false-propaganda, that when the British voted for Brexit they did not vote to leave the E.U. without an agreement (a leaving agreement). In reality: When the British voted for Brexit they certainly did NOT vote for the E.U. to indefinitely-control British trade after “leaving” (this through the E.U. “Customs Union”, for the bogus-excuse of protecting the Northern Ireland “Good Friday peace agreement”, an agreement which can instead be protected by not-imposing physical controls on the border).
I hope this helps.
- LudwigLv 69 months ago
I paid him money, and will again if it looks like it might do some good,.
- geraldLv 79 months ago
Farage is a conservative loved Margaret thatcher was a yuppie worked in the stock market , Europe is a Union together for the benefit of all ,That is not desire of Capitalism the Nation loves the NHS a social idea they hate and the only way of destroying it is to fix it break it and call friends in the USA to bail it out BUY IT like the gas leckie water your basic needs for a price for profit Winner takes all the devil takes the hindmost , And leaving Europe leaves us broke like Greece and unable to defend ourselves we will need a huge loan or sell things NHS i warn you it will happen ignore the lies of the brexiters it will happen
- What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
- Anonymous9 months ago
It is not Farage that wants to wreck Britain. It is the traitors in Westminster
- Jack HLv 79 months ago
Banks's money allegedlywas Russian sourced, now, it seems there is also American right wing funding. The objective of both parties seems to be the destabilization of Europe...
- Anonymous9 months ago
probably Putin .....
- LônLv 79 months ago
Who's not whose....who wrecked your education?
Farage is trying to carry out the will of the people, to get us out of the EU.
Remaniac losers are trying to keep us in...