Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Society & CultureMythology & Folklore · 6 months ago

evolutionists and atheists can you even give just one example of one species giving birth to a different species under natural circumstances?

36 Answers

Relevance
  • Justin
    Lv 7
    6 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    The 'evidence' provided by atheistic science is always either 'millions of light years away' while peering through cleverly bent glass, or 'millions of years away' from current observations around us. That is exactly the way it will stay too, because that is the only way it actually works.

    If the 'super luck' required to make any of their theories possible even existed at all, we would see at least one example happening right now, particularly given the fact that the number of 'events' occurring on microscopic levels of reality already represents a domain comparable to vast eons of time or millions of light years to our 'mezzo' level of experience. We don't see any 'accidental miracles' happening there, just the occasional 'very lucky' or 'rare' event which cannot possibly give credence to their impossible narratives.

    What they conveniently forget to explain is that the passage of eons of time works in two distinct ways which counteract each other. One is in decreasing improbabilities, (as they say), since the shear volume of possible outcomes makes 'everything but the kitchen sink' the standard applied by nature. Everything is bound to be tried at least once and probably many times. However, the flip side must also be true as great lengths of time pass. The odds also grow increasingly smaller that anything 'constantly conducive' to life can be maintained while relying on this same luck, unless there is an unmentioned 'x factor' involved in making sure it is maintained using models or direct intervention.

    There is.

    Sensible people called Him 'GOD.'

    • Climate Realist
      Lv 7
      6 months agoReport

      Can you give even one example of clay turning into a man or a rib turning into a woman?

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 6 months ago

    A horse and a donkey are not the same species. Cross a female horse with a male donkey and you get a mule.

    • Thumbs up for TRYING.[]But, mules are not a new species.[]
      Cross a mule with a mule, and you get nothing. Mules are sterile.[] Ask an old farmer, and check back here with your results..

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • Paul
    Lv 7
    6 months ago

    Of course not, and no scientist has ever made such a ridiculous statement. But the fossil record clearly demonstrates that species change in form, size and characteristics over time, in order to remain well adapted to an ever-changing environment. So, the questions is, how much can a species change, and still be considered the same species?

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 6 months ago

    They know if they had Real living example, they would say in a very bold way... Just a few lies & False Stories & some logic of kids...

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • John
    Lv 4
    6 months ago

    Yes the caentaur. Produced by a horse mounting a woman, I believe, although it could be the other way around.

    That was thousands of years ago.

    More modern is the wolf and dog. Two completely unrelated species yet able to mate AND produce fertile offspring.

    Not all dogs and wolfs will do the act. My ***** won't and she won't go near hybreds like mules either.

    She fights and finds it perverse.

    She likes her own kind.

  • barty
    Lv 7
    6 months ago

    That’s not how evolution works. No one but lying preachers pretends it involves one species giving birth to another.

    When you get tired of the lies, try reading up on real science.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 6 months ago

    That is not what evolution predicts. It is like asking Christians why did Yahweh **** out a risen lord and saviour Moses from his lactating mammaries by speaking the words abracadabra fe fi fo fum on the 9th day of creation? It is a gross and completely ridiculous distortion of the actual argument and is not meant to discuss truth but to dismiss it with a wave of the hand by ignorant and uneducated people. No animals ever gives birth to completely different animals and no evolutionary biologist has ever made such a claim. The only ones who say that is what evolution teaches are Creationists who wish the pesky evidence for evolution isn't real. They are wrong, evolution is real and the evidence for it is sky-high, it is time to grow up and figure it out.

    • ...Show all comments
    • Dane6 months agoReport

      The religious rejection of Evolution has been characterized by people shutting their ears and eyes to what can be demonstrated in order to preserve belief. These are people unwilling to change for truth but willing to lie for faith. Do not get your science from those trying to destroy science.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 6 months ago

    If evolution was true where are the failures? Where are the three and four legged humans? Where are the 6 winged birds? Where are the flying pigs? I guess the spaghetti monster eat them.

  • 6 months ago

    ikr because there are BILLIONS of observed examples of a species birthing exactly the same species

    and the fossil record is woefully incomplete if they want to point micro evolution

    • ...Show all comments
    • barty
      Lv 7
      6 months agoReport

      Don't expect No Chance to listen. He made up his mind about everything when he was four years old and hasn't changed a single opinion since then.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 6 months ago

    It conveniently takes millions of years to see that lol

    • ...Show all comments
    • antonius
      Lv 7
      6 months agoReport

      Sorry Jennifer, atheists function within reality, not in belief of little magical stories re. the bible, and I feel certain that you have no idea about the real persons behind the writing of the NT, nor why that fiction was invented.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • Bokito
    Lv 6
    6 months ago

    Dawkins explains that very well in "The Magic of reality".

    • Log in to reply to the answers
Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.