Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Arts & HumanitiesBooks & Authors · 11 months ago

Is Wikipedia a reliable source?

18 Answers

Relevance
  • 11 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    No, It's not. There's a lot of misinformation.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 11 months ago

    Most of it is, but not enough to use it as a connection on term papers or a scientific report.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Marli
    Lv 7
    11 months ago

    Some entries are and some are not. Wikipedia will warn readers with a "buyer beware sort of notice" if, in its opinion, the entry seems iffy or needs citations. Check the citations provided at the bottom of the article. Don't take it as the only source unless you can't find others, and even then, be skeptical.

    Rule of reference librarians: find two or more sources for every answer you give.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Sharon
    Lv 6
    11 months ago

    depends. Scientific and literary articles are usually good, although in a famous incident Philip Roth pointed out an error in the article about one of his books, and the editor rejected his correction as being from an undependable source! Deep history normally is safe. Problem is occasional trolls will deliberately mess up an article and you see it before it is corrected, and political, commercial and religious articles are vulnerable.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 11 months ago

    Partially reliable, as contribution can be made by anyone.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 11 months ago

    I would check the sources because anyone can and do provide information on the site.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 11 months ago

    It's as accurate as the information it collects. Nothing is infallible.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • i think it is, without it many online would be lost.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Nancy
    Lv 7
    11 months ago

    It is when you are using material that appears as sourced and you have investigated that source, so the same as anything else.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • .
    Lv 7
    11 months ago

    No.

    But the claim that "anyone can edit it" is somewhat overstated. The are protections in place against vandalism. If you're looking for a basic fact, it's usually correct. But don't use Wikipedia in a formal research paper.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    11 months ago

    Since it can be edited by anyone, no.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.