Can my ex amend her tax returns to claim child tax credits that were originally agreed to go to me?
My ex girlfriend lived with me for 9 years as unmarried cohabitating domestic partners. We have an 8 year old daughter together.
We lived together as a family under the agreement she pay me a monthly amount towards living expenses (she called it "rent" on the checks), and I claim our daughter on taxes every year, which made sense since I paid the majority of our child's expenses.
After we broke up and she moved out, she visited an accountant who amended several of her previous tax returns, giving her a tax refund for several years of child tax credits. Meaning the IRS will now go after me to try to get back the child tax credit money which I already claimed DUE TO THE AGREEMENT I HAD WITH THE MOTHER AT THE TIME I FILED.
Is her accountant legally liable for any damages by advising and filing her amendments that unjustly claim the tax credits that were already agreed to me years ago?
- Coffee DrinkerLv 77 months ago
There are several issues here, lets break it down one at a time:
1. Your agreement means nothing. Federal tax law determines who can claim a child in any given situation and you don't get to just overrule the law by making an agreement with someone. That's why I can't just let a random stranger claim my kids to get a bigger tax benefit than what I get.
2. Although your agreement is worthless in this matter, your situation (unmarried, cohabitating parents) is one of the unique scenarios where both parents actually qualify to claim the child. The IRS will allow either ONE of you to claim the child as long as you don't both claim the child the same tax year.
3. Note that the fact that you paid a majority of the child's expenses is irrelevant because that is NOT one of the requirements of claiming a child. The requirement is that the child is related to you, passes an age test, lives with you, and the child does not pay their OWN expenses. Under these rules a parent who lives with a child can claim that child even if that parent didn't pay the child's expenses.
4. Because your ex legally qualifies to claim the child (point #3), neither she nor her accountant are committing any wrongdoing by filing an amendment to trigger an investigation so that the IRS can settle the matter according to the tax law. So no matter what happens, don't expect compensation from either of them.
5. In this situation where there's a duplicate claim (two people claim the same child) where both claims are valid the IRS has tiebreaker rules to apply to determine who gets the claim. Those tiebreakers determine who gets the tax benefits (not your agreement)
6. The first tiebreaker is that a parent always beats a non-parent. That doesn't apply here since both of you are the child's parents. In this case the next tiebreaker is that the parent with the higher AGI (Adjusted Gross Income) wins the claim, and the parent with the lower AGI gets nothing.
7a. Since you mention that you paid most of the bills, I would assume you had the higher income for most (or all) of the years in question. If my assumption is correct then you'll win the claim, keep the refund you already received, and your Ex's request for additional refund via an amended return will be denied.
7b. However, if the IRS sides with her because she had a higher AGI then you will have to repay any refund that was based on claiming the child, there will also be interest charges applied. So do not just ignore the IRS letters and think this will all go away on its own.
8. The IRS is not (yet) asking you to repay your refund, they're only asking that you verify what you claimed on your tax returns. That likely means providing a birth certificate to prove that you are the biological parent and then address records showing that you lived with the child during the year's in question. Your address should be easy to verify with things like employment records, voter registration or old utility bills with your name and address on them. To prove that the child lived with you look for doctor's records, school records or possibly copies of a lease listing your daughter as a resident or anything else that ties your daughter to living at the same address. It might also help in the dispute if you can prove that your ex was also living there, so that she can't try to claim she was living elsewhere with your child.
9. If both you and your ex are able to verify your relationship to the child and that you lived with the child, then the IRS will automatically apply the tiebreaker of the AGI, you don't need to provide anything for that, since its on both of your tax returns.
10. The IRS will never discuss your ex's returns or amendments with you. They will only tell you whether or not they have verified your claim or if they expect you to repay anything. They won't say what they determined about her or whether or not they applied any consequences to her for filing an invalid claim.
Good luck, this could get messy, but whatever you do, do NOT ignore the letters from the IRS.
- 7 months ago
If she is actually entitled to them, yes she can.
The thing is, you all lived together, so you are also entitled. I am guessing she will be SOL. Your agreement means nothing, what matters is who is actually entitled to the claim.
- Casey YLv 77 months ago
Your agreement and whether she can file are two different things. She could file for the credits, but then she'd be in violation of your agreement.
- Max HooplaLv 77 months ago
She can amend her 2016 2017 and 2018 tax returns and generate a refund. Maybe.
- What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
- babyboomer1001Lv 77 months ago
She can do it. When the IRS comes after you, send them a copy of your agreement. That will protect you. If it was court ordered, send them a copy of the court order allowing you to claim....Source(s): Certified Paralegal, with 25+ years' experience.
- StephenWeinsteinLv 77 months ago
It's illegal to claim someone because of an agreement if the parents live together. If she would have been able to claim them without the agreement, then it's not unjust for her to claim them with the agreement, because the agreement isn't valid. There are a number of requirements for agreements pertaining to claiming a child, one of which is that the parents can't be living together. And even then, the agreement can only affect the exemption for the child and not the credit. The tax credits, by law, must be claimed by whomever would have been able to claim them without the agreement.
And if the IRS is going after you only to get back the money, then you are getting off very easy. If you wouldn't have been able to claim them without the agreement, then the IRS should be penalizing, and could pursue criminal charges.
- NALv 77 months ago
When taxpayers don't agree, the eligible parent with the highest AGI will win. This true when you live together, married or not.
Is that you?
If this is not you, you can take her to court.