Atheists who claim Jesus Christ never existed: Do you also claim Mohammed and Buddha never existed?

32 Answers

Relevance
  • Caesar
    Lv 7
    5 months ago
    Best answer

    The problem is with their journey and goals, Jesus supposedly need to be a common man, before his sacrifice so a common pan on a province of the Roman Empire, will not let enough evidence of his existence, curiously we got more hard evidence and historical mentions of different sources of others Jewish messiah claimants and even Christian messiah claimants, than from Jesus.

    Muhammad was an Arab merchant that was involved in tribal wars when he began to subjugate other tribes through either diplomacy or conquest. Armed conflict that get you mentioned by your enemies, so we got more hard evidence and historical mentions of different sources ...and we got a tomb many pilgrims continue to practice a ziyarat—a ritual visit—to the tomb... curiously In the Wahhabi interpretation of Islam, burial is to take place in unmarked graves.

    Buddha...Gautama is the primary figure in Buddhism. He is believed by Buddhists to be an enlightened teacher who attained full Buddhahood ...hint believed...the life of the Buddha as it comes down to us is largely fabrication. Yet today, the historicity of the Buddha is rarely questioned, though we continue to question the historical basis of various events that happened during his long lifetime... atheist are just the people who do not believe in the invisible entities that some people call gods... not about ..if people exist or not.

    • Caesar
      Lv 7
      2 weeks agoReport

      Yes religious claims are full of that Patrick, nice you notice

  • Saad M
    Lv 5
    5 months ago

    Among the prophets and messengers are Jesus (prayer and salvation of God on him) who predicted the advent of the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him).

  • ron h
    Lv 7
    5 months ago

    I don't know that most atheists believe that. If he did exist, there's no proof that he was "the son of god."

    • Patrick
      Lv 7
      5 months agoReport

      A fallacy is always a fallacy - no matter who uses it.

  • 5 months ago

    LOL! Read the NT comic parodies and learn that the Jesus you worship never was crucified, never buried and never rose from death. Christians pray to and worship a well-known Roman.

  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • Anonymous
    5 months ago

    stupid question existence of one does not prove the other

    there is no god and there are plenty of kooks claim they talked to god

    proves nothing

    other than your own story book,, is there proof collaborating the existence of them and Jesus ?

    • Patrick
      Lv 7
      5 months agoReport

      A fallacy is always a fallacy - no matter who uses it.

  • 5 months ago

    Atheists who make that claim are ignorant jackasess, they should take a history class.

    • Patrick
      Lv 7
      5 months agoReport

      A fallacy is always a fallacy - no matter who uses it.

  • Paul
    Lv 6
    5 months ago

    Actually there is far more historical evidence for Jesus Christ than for Muhammed, Buddha, or any other person from more than 2,000 years ago, including a whole collection of historical texts written by people who knew Him personally, and live in daily relationship with Him for several years, a historian's treasure chest!. Muhammed - 0. Buddha - 0.

    • nikki1234
      Lv 7
      5 months agoReport

      shakyamuni lived 80-years, and the teachings during his life are collectively called: the "60,000-teachings".
      lotus sutra: https://www.nichirenlibrary.org/en/lsoc/toc/

  • 5 months ago

    There is legitimate contemporaneous evidence for the objective existence of both Mohammad and Buddha. Unfortunately, the Bible was created by the Roman Empire specifically to legitimize their last state sponsored religion, and after Catholicism emerged, Emperor Theodosius ordered that all official records of Jesus be purged from the Empire's archives, lest they contradict the New Testament's official version of His life. Thus, if Jesus were actually real, humanity was deprived of what little independent evidence of His existence there may have been. We already know the Bible was intended to be Roman political propaganda so, lacking independent contemporaneous confirmation, Jesus historical existence remains unverifiable.

    • Yes, The Roman Empire spent 300 years trying to stamp out all religions that did not support the Empire. The Bible was much fiddled with to support the new Roman Empire, the Roman Catholic Church.

  • Huh?
    Lv 7
    5 months ago

    Atheists don't believe in god or gods. The existence of a historical Jesus is debated among biblical and history scholars, it is irreverent to atheism.

    • Nigel5 months agoReport

      RUN JEWS RUN FASTER COS CAUGHT BY MY ANNUNAKI MEAN GAME OVER
      (Other seek DANNY WOO VK in QWANT for book of life and the truth about everything)

  • Anonymous
    5 months ago

    Just produce one, just one, scrap of evidence that Jesus ever existed. I will accept anything written at the time as exists for the other two.

    • Patrick
      Lv 7
      5 months agoReport

      A fallacy is always a fallacy - no matter who uses it.

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.