Which statement is more logical?

1. ‘We should ban all muslims until we figure what is going on’

2. ‘We should ban all guns till we figure out what is going on’

10 Answers

Relevance
  • 5 months ago

    Banning a particular religious group goes against the very foundation of this country. And you can't stop people from practicing their religion. I assume you actually mean "ban further immigration by Muslims." But the logistics of that are very complicated. Do you ask everyone at the border what religion they practice? What if they lie? There are many Arabs who are not Muslims, and many Muslims who don't live in the Middle East. About a third of the population of Thailand, for example, is Muslim.

    • armouror
      Lv 5
      2 months agoReport

      That is Not a problem islam is a cult there is no allah

  • Jim2
    Lv 7
    5 months ago

    ban all guns. Might be worth a try.

    • armouror
      Lv 5
      2 months agoReport

      then the Muslims take over Using big knives like they do in london

  • 5 months ago

    Number 1 is more logical.

    Muslims do not belong in any Western country.

  • David
    Lv 7
    5 months ago

    Neither is logical. The difference is that right-wingers have actually said the first one about Muslims while no one has suggested that about guns.

  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • Anonymous
    5 months ago

    If you ban guns, crime will even be worse and guns will cost more money, so technically criminals will make more money with guns and normal civilians have no gun to protect themselves.

    Banning guns is the most stupid idea ever.

  • Anonymous
    5 months ago

    Muslim ban was ridiculous. If they had said , "we must close the Southern border completely until we figure what is going" , it would have made more sense.

    I think the Muslim ban was part of trump campaign to please right wing Christians in GOP.

    Muslims are not a threat to US. May be they are a threat to Europe. But definitely not to US.

    • armouror
      Lv 5
      2 months agoReport

      This is law in Muslim countries

      https://talkinjihadblues.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/koran-654-allah-okays-raping-babies/

  • 5 months ago

    I don't recall importation of Jihadists cited anywhere in the Constitution or Bill of Rights ..

    Did I miss something ?

    • armouror
      Lv 5
      2 months agoReport

      https://talkinjihadblues.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/koran-654-allah-okays-raping-babies/

  • 5 months ago

    That assumes you have power to do either

    you don't

    Criminals will always have guns. Someone who is willing to murder someone else isn't going to care about your little gun laws

    and you can't ban an Ideology

    • armouror
      Lv 5
      2 months agoReport

      here is sharia and this is Sharia at its best Know this every muslim supports sharia How many are actually practising this in the USA

      https://talkinjihadblues.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/koran-654-allah-okays-raping-babies/

  • 5 months ago

    both are equally racist....

    • armouror
      Lv 5
      2 months agoReport

      Islam is a cult not a race and Muslim men want this as law

      https://talkinjihadblues.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/koran-654-allah-okays-raping-babies/

  • Jeff D
    Lv 7
    5 months ago

    They're both made-up nonsense.

    • armouror
      Lv 5
      2 months agoReport

      this is True

      https://talkinjihadblues.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/koran-654-allah-okays-raping-babies/

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.