Poll: should Oath remove the Anonymous feature now that they're improving this site?

Answer 1

No. The endless whining about anon users is entertaining.

Answer 2

YES... IF your scared of saying something here then you shouldnt be here..

Answer 3

i don't think so, some people don't want to reveal their identity and need to go anon

Answer 4

I think anonymous is a good feature, and good for sensitive questions, especially about health or relationships. It puts a barrier between the answerers and the Asker.

Answer 5

As a compromise, how about a setting so that a user can block anonymous, just as they can block individual trolls. That should cut down on the inflammatory questions posted in Politics and Religion.

Answer 6

No not really some people are shy and need the anonymous feature.

• Little Big Man

  Lv 7

  6 months agoReport

  Yes, I do see your point, my good friend.
  

Answer 7

So you consider the reCAPTCHA puzzles and 15-character limit improvements?

Answer 8

No they should not

Answer 9

Absolutely not. Not everyone wants their identity known after asking an embarrassing question.

Answer 10

Yeah. There are trolls who really abuse that feature. Those puzzies should show their faces.

They are no better than the "level 7's who are always moving questions" that most of these same Anons complain about.

Source(s): 79