Do you think democracy needs re-modelling? As it currently stands, it no longer works?
Neither was a good candidate. Neither should have been made president.
Would it not make perfect sense that instead of having to choose from just 2 bad candidates, a 3rd "No choice" is allowed?
This would allow the voters to choose a decent candidate, and if none are available, then the election is re-done with new candidates.
Currently, you either choose A or B, regardless of whether A or B are any good. If both A and B were found to eat babies*, you'll currently elect a baby eater. Under a reformed system, you'd have the opportunity to elect a non-baby eater
*No babies were consumed in the making of this question