what's the most disappointing film adaption of a book you have watched . mines The Meg, the book/s are very good the film sucked?

7 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 year ago

    The Shining, I couldn't put the book down but I thought the film was mostly boring.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    World War Z. Not a single scene from the book appeared in the movie. Not a single character from the book appeared in the movie. The book would make a great HBO miniseries. Too bad Brad Pitt bought the rights in order to make sure that never happens.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 year ago

    Queen of the Damned. It was TWO books (The Vampire Lestat, Queen of the Damned), with parts ripped out.

    • forgot about those books read them years ago , very good

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    Disney's 2003 version of "A Wrinkle In Time" was a real stinker. And their 2018 version wasn't much better.

    The book is a classic though.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 year ago

    Clive Cussler was so upset about what they did to "Raise the Titanic", that he vowed to NEVER sell the rights to one of his books again.

    But he relented after 25 years and 50 more books and tried again with "Sahara".

    When asked what he thought of it, his reply was..........."Call me again in another 25 years. "

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    They put the one cool scene in the trailer

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 year ago

    The Hunger Games movies vs. The Hunger Games books. Movies are terrible and literally remove characters that are important to the plot

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.