is Circumcision genital mutilation and why is it allowed?

11 Answers

  • Anonymous
    5 days ago

    Whom do I contact about Jews killing 70 million in Soviet Union by gulags, famine, or shooting squads? How can Russian Orthodox get some justice?

    Russian Orthodox Metropolitan Ioann Snychev was poisoned/murdered by Jew Putin (aka Shalomov) because he refused to work for Jews. KGB poisoned Putin; Putin died in 2007; now doubles (who wear latex masks) pretend to be Putin. Medvedev is David Aaronovich Mendel. Jews murdered Tsar Nicolas 2nd's family; Jews bled them for six hours according to ritual.

    Tsar Nicolas' family was sacrificed by Jews (they bled 6 hours); their remains were burnt; their blood drank; ashes from remains were sprinkled onto 50 hard-boiled eggs (dish called scido Amafreikis) [50 egg shells were found outside the place of ritual murder]. Also, decapitated Tsar's head (which was grey ... hair turned grey when he saw his kids being knifed).. Ritualistic murder... (blood libel is same thing as anti-Semitism ... a lie by Jews to flee justice). Jews came up that Tsar's family was shot. Tsar appeared to warn that

    whosoever worships false remains will become possessed by demons (this just happened like a decade ago ... maybe less)… Jews collect heads of leaders because they believe in reincarnation.

    How about Jews coming up with a mocking holiday April 1st because resurrection of Jesus happened on that day? Jews came up with mocking holidays 23 February (Day of Soviet Army) which was capitulation by cowards in Tsar’s army… or March 8 (international Woman’s day) which celebrates lesbian/prostitute Klara Tsetkin and Rosa Luxembourg.

    Three biggest saints in heaven (in this order): Theotokos Virgin Mary, John the Baptist, and Tsar Nicolas 2nd

    Four biggest sinners in hell (in this order from the bottom of hell moving up to our level): Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin)

    You could joke that Marx is a bigger sinner than Engels because Marx fooked Engels but how is Lenin bigger sin than Stalin when Lenin was fooked by Zinoviev (even by Bronstein once)?

    Lenin's brain was the size of walnut. He had syphilis. Was alcoholic. Born from incest degenerate family. Was in insane asylum. Wife Kruspkaya was probably lesbian 'cause what normal woman would stay with him?

    According to Russian Orthodox researcher Grigoriy Klimov, three stages of degeneracy are

    1)sodomy (69, anal, oral, masturbation, pedophilia, incest, necrophilia, beastiality, orgies, hand job, bj, even all non-missionary positions between husband and wife, etc.)

    2)insane asylum

    3)physical deformities in kids (eyes looking at different angles, wolf jaw, rabbit lip, horse foot, different length limbs, etc.)

    all these accompanied by drug/alcohol abuse

    Jews have like six times more degenerates than other nations because they don't have monkhood. Jewish degenerates become politicians (or similar high rank in society). In Germany during Hitler time, it was eight times. Hitler, Stalin (aka Jugashvilli which means son of Jew), Roosevelt, Churchill were all Jewish degenerates. Hitler had many Jewish coworkers as homosexual partners. Stalin was expelled from seminary for sodomy.

    A few centuries ago, angel appeared to Orthodox Christian community and said not to buy from Jews at bazaar because it's sprinkled with blood (something like that)

    Those were facts… and now for some Conspiracy Theory: Elimination of comments on Yahoo Answers means that Project Pogo is completed. Now, Project Zyphr will initiate in winter. They will turn off electricity for a few days to gather dissidents into underground concentration camps. The remaining people will be chipped. Only marked people will receive food in closed stores. So, when people sign up for food, gov't clerk presses secret button to administer the unforgivable mark of the beast. Hide within 10-15 people group (saints Gabriel Urgebadze and Serafim of Sarov); no documents; no electronics.

    Source(s): If the last descendant rejects mark of the beast, then his/her direct ancestors go to permanent heaven. To reject mark of the beast, one needs to hide within a 10-15 people group without electronics/documents. Documents are from Satan; burn them. Electronics can be used to track you and to show the antichrist (even on old broken unplugged TV set from 1970's); forgive me.
  • 4 weeks ago

    Not when it is done to males.  It is more hygenic.

  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    Back in the day BEFORE indoor plumbing and taking baths & showers was EXTREMELY uncommon, the instances of penis cancer was much higher from the lack of hygiene.

  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    i love my foreskin

  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 7
    2 years ago

    Cutting a piece of somebody else's body without any medical need has to be called mutilation, there is no other word for that.

    Now, regarding why it's allowed, you have to distinguish between two cases:

    1) In USA (and maybe Canada?), circumcision comes from the age Victorian morality and was in particular presented as a way to avoid masturbation. The majority of the population has been converted to that so that now it's deeply rooted in their culture, and changing a dominant culture is not an easy task. People can get very irrational when you try to change their habits.

    2) In Europe, this is almost only performed for religious purposes, for Jews and Muslims. So this interdiction could be interpreted as an attack on the rights of religious minorities. If it were only Muslims maybe some countries would have forbidden it by now (like for instance niqab and burqa in France/Belgium). But restricting the rights of Jews is a big taboo. So people just "care about their own business", and don't try to save the Jewish babies they don't really care that much about. An other point is that some people think it's better to allow people to have their kid mutilated in a public hospital under medical supervision rather than pushing them to perform the mutilation by themselves in some dirty basement in the ghettos.

  • Mike
    Lv 7
    2 years ago

    Yes, it is.

    Its allowed because its a religious ritual and no government laws will interfere with religion.

  • 2 years ago

    Yes it is and should not be allowed. If a boy is taught to pull back the skin and wash it daily, he has no problem.

    The whole practice is based on religion, which should not be involved in health care.

  • Pyrus
    Lv 6
    2 years ago

    Yes, it is. I actually once asked my own parents about this, and they told me that it's "to have better sex". After some research that examined the long-term effects of circumcision on sexual function, it was concluded that circumcision did not adversely affect sexual functions, but it caused a significant improvement in erectile function and overall sexual satisfaction.

    EDIT: Who are the two idiots what disliked my answer without providing an actual argument? This is SCIENTIFIC research, it doesn't even have to do with religion.

  • .
    Lv 7
    2 years ago

    I suppose one could look at it that way. But when I was in high school wrestling, we all weighed in nude. So back then, it was easier to see the differences. A circumcised penis simply looks cleaner and is more sanitary, in my opinion.

  • Lôn
    Lv 7
    2 years ago

    Yes...forcing children to have it done should be illegal. If an adult decides to have it done to themselves....fair enough.

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.