I just heard on the news that North Korea and America are going to plan to do a complete and permanent denuclearisation?

Question

Do you think America and North Korea will denuclearise?

Its easy to talk, but they have to do it is hard

Answer 1

oky

Answer 2

WE ARE GOING TO MAKE A DOME AROUND THEM BUT FIRST A WALL

Answer 3

You cannot believe everything you "hear" because I just "heard" that Trump was paying Kim to stage this whole excuse for political leverage by terrorising the American People.

Answer 4

Dont believe the rumors you say you heard... The USA WILL ALWAYS AND FOREVER HAVE NUKES as long as anyone in the world has them.

Answer 5

Knowing U.S. HIGHLY UNLIKELY.

"Talks, not 'negotiations' with North Korea: President Donald Trump's willingness to chat with Kim Jong Un shouldn't be construed as anything more than that."
http://rall.com/comic/trump-the-madman-peace-with-korea

https://nsnbc.me/2018/03/09/88006/ "A policy of de-escalation between the USA and the DPRK is not unprecedented. In fact Pyongyang’s hard line approach on the development of nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons came only after the breakdown of the previous rapprochement in the 1990s. In 1994, the administration of President Bill Clinton and North Korea signed an “Agreed Framework” that froze Pyongyang’s nuclear programme and aimed to normalise US-North Korean relations. The rapprochement, however, reached a dead end in 2002 when President George W. Bush launched his “you are either with us or you are with the enemy” policy.

Under the terms of the 1994 framework, Pyongyang agreed to freeze and ultimately dismantle its nuclear programme in exchange for “the full normalization of political and economic relations with the United States”. This mean that by 2003, a US-led consortium would build two light-water nuclear reactors in North Korea to compensate for the loss of nuclear power; Until then, the US would supply the north with 500,000 tons per year of heavy fuel; The US would lift sanctions, remove North Korea from its list of state sponsors of terrorism, and normalise the political relationship, which is still subject to the terms of the 1953 Korean War armistice; And finally, both sides would provide “formal assurances” against the threat or use of nuclear weapons.

However, in 1998, US officials involved in the implementation of the agreement testified to Congress that both the US and the International Atomic Energy Agency were satisfied that there had been “no fundamental violation of any aspect of the Framework Agreement” by North Korea. However, back-paddling on its own pledges when the U.S. observed a surprisingly compliant and cooperative North Korea, Washington failed to follow through on all of the above points."

U.S. foreign policy guarantees other countries actually have nukes not to end up mincemeat like Iraq, Libya, Syria.

Answer 6

No

Answer 7

IF that were to happen, USA would be in grave danger from foreign attacks and invasions... Russia and China would be celebrating, rejoicing and drooling at the prospect of harming us at any moment... because USA has a dumb, idiotic, ignorant, retarded, stupid dope for president. I won't be surprised if the plump chump grump tRump has applied for citizenship in Russia to live in a fancy, ritzy, swanky hotel with adjoining rooms with his boyfriend, Putin.

Answer 8

yes

Answer 9

Don't know about North Korea, but America never will. Just look at our history in foreign affairs. America always tells other nations to stand down, but we never do.Besides, military is a huge industry/employer in this country. (Actually our military is the largest employer IN THE WORLD). Too much loss of American taxpayer funded jobs, etc. involved in REDUCING, let alone eliminating our nuclear arsenal. Not good for "business", and if you reduce military expenditures, it's harder to justify ripping off the American taxpayer.

Answer 10

Who knows what will happen? Two nutcases talking I don't have much optimism.