Atheists do not have ANY belief about origins because they don't use them. How would an evolutionist know anything at all about origins of life? By what authority? Hmm, a theory without a beginning? How does that work or pass the test? The materialist attempts to explain origins are non-existent.
One atheist here: "You don't need faith if you have science giving you actual facts." But they present NO fact! How delusional or inept and ignorant is that, to fail yourself before beginning w/o support? Do you come here saying the Moon is made of cheese just to gum up the works and show yourself a fool? Only nutjob idiots fail themselves before they begin.
Another atheist: "Atheists don't use or need faith - they base their position on reason applied to evidence." Atheists can't offer one assertion of atheism as a truth, but "base their position on reason"? How does that work? And once again, the inept ignorant and delusional atheist talks about facts, but has none. Again, only nutjob idiots dismiss themselves before they begin.
Another atheist here: "i regard the big bang theory as the most competent and evidence based theory." Geez, what evidence? Myth of OPINION? Another atheist bites the dust, completely ignorant of burden of proof and fails himself. And again, only a nutjob idiot dismisses himself before he even begins.
Another atheist: "prefer proof. Not the imaginations of bronze age tards from from 3000 years ago." If he actually understood science he would know that proof applies in philosophy and math - not science. Your use of 'proof' makes your pedigree as a scientist questionable. Prefers "proof" but has no fact or evidence; how delusional is that? He doesn't even know where to begin, let alone what real science entails, but thinks he "knows" something? Again, how delusional is that? Why not tell us what it is you "know"? Afraid of looking like a fool? Oops, too late.
Another atheist: "You need to make a clear distinction between justified, true beliefs based on copious evidence". But again, the atheist presents NO fact! How is this "justified"? What is "true"? By what method process or authority? How delusional or inept and ignorant is that, to present OPINION as fact and to fail yourself before beginning w/o support? Only nutjob idiots fail themselves before they begin.
Another atheist wants to redefine faith to a Google blurb that confirms his own bias, then make New Age free thinking conclusions based on a bait and switch fallacy. Only nutjob idiots fail themselves before they begin, presenting a logical fallacy as a valid argument.
Another atheist is "partial to the Norse Creation myth. More children's pretend stories that apply to nothing; another bait and switch fallacy, another false presupposition that makes their conclusions rabid, failing himself before he sat down like a nutjob idiot.
Another atheist avoids the "faith" issue altogether and wants to talk about how atheism ONLY means "whether a God or gods exists," another bait and switch fallacy because he can't deal with true faith. Worse, he claims "Scientist can trace back to about 10^-43 seconds after start of the big bang". Really? You think mathematics is a substitute for evidence or do you know anything at all about valid evidence in fact? Nope, he says "they have evidence for everything that came after," but presents NO evidence. Presumably you are bright enough to know that your saying so doesn't make it so. That means your comment is an unsupported assertion; a logical fallacy and therefore technically irrational. Only nutjob idiots fail themselves before they begin.
Is EVERYTHING atheists say irrational? I've made a summary of only this one page of answers by atheists, and the pattern is clear. Atheists THINK they have evidence, but have none, or they would present it. Their favorite tactic is using the shifting the burden fallacy and unsupported OPINION. The burden of proof is not on me to disprove your claims, it is on you to prove your claims.. Your claims cannot be true based on an absence of evidence or some "mention" somewhere. You don't get it; inept, ignorant and delusional. Children playing pretend in the adult section.
By the atheist substitution of a materialistic explanation for origins, you deny God, yet you also deny any burden to disprove God when the burden is on you to prove your claims.... How is it that you don't understand that your affirmative claims Darwinism, Big Bang have the same burden? So we get inundated with circular reasoning and a myriad of unsupported OPINIONS. They don't even seem to understand how they fail themselves. Only nutjob idiots dismiss themselves before they begin, which has become the atheist modus apperandi.
When you don't understand Logic, it makes you sound stupid. Whether you are an ignorant liar or a deliberate liar/propagandist makes no difference.
No paleoanthropologists (those who study the fossil evidence for man’s origin) would dare to seriously raise the question, “Did man evolve from apes?” The only permissible question is, “From which apes did man evolve?” Still a little underhanded, don't you think, like finding "life" on other planets and aliens is a true and responsible endeavor?
Let's be clear on what "faith" is so we're all on the same page. The concept of “blind faith” is a recent invention, found nowhere in Scripture. If you go back to God’s Word, you’ll find that the Hebrew word for faith, by its very definition, refers to a logical, robust, unwavering confidence in the truth.
C. H. Spurgeon said it beautifully:
Faith abhors conjectures, it will not put its foot down upon fictions, but rests upon matters of fact. Faith never deals in the imaginary goods of opinion, theory, speculation, and probability; she searches for the priceless pearl of certainty; she needs to know.
Ultimately evolutionists want their religion of secularism and atheism—worldviews which are already being taught in public school classrooms—to be the only religion these students are exposed to. Of course, they claim that atheism is not a religion, but it is! In their worldview, they have faith that somehow the universe came into existence and by natural processes life arose—that is their belief system, their religion.
What have you confirmed that you know as fact, what measurement have you taken that makes you think like you do? When you can answer this question, you will be bubbling over with details in the integrity of truth in fact, and your blind faith will be conformed into "faith" when confirmed.
If you believe in Abiogenesis, the Big Bang and Darwinian evolution you believe things that are a lot more incredible than God. How pointless can a person desire to be? All of this to destroy dissenters of your false belief? How delusional is that, relying on blind faith and unsupported OPINION?