Why no outrage over Trump's Pay-For-Play scandal?

Accusations of the Clinton Foundation pay-for-play and yet no proof. Here is actual proof that the Trump Foundation (yes he has one also) committed the crime he is accusing Hillary of.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/os-tr...

7 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    4 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    the 'liberal media' goes too easy on him

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 4 years ago

    To date 87% of the former Trump University students say they got their money's worth and are satisfied. Numbers like those will make any law suit an exercise in futility.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    Yawn! As usual, liberals think anything associated with Trump is a huge crisis, yet conveniently overlook what the Clintons do. When are you going to learn that anything Trump is accused of, the Clintons have done worse and first? Give it up!

    The Clinton university scandal

    http://nypost.com/2016/06/12/the-clinton-universit...

    Clinton University Scandal Netted Bill $16.5 Million

    http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2016/06/14/cli...

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 4 years ago

    So according to the liberal media Trump donation of 25K to a group associated with the FL AG was the reason she didn't look into Trump University with no other evidence to support their claim but Bill waiting for Lynch to arrive on a Tarmac in NV then decided to stroll over to her plane when it arrived to simply talk about Grand kids? telling all her staff to leave the plane so they could talk about grand kids

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 4 years ago

    You don't understand pay-for-play.

    Also, has Trump been indicted? The fact that Hillary wasn't was enough to make her clear of all crimes, past, present, or future.

    • ndmagicman
      Lv 7
      4 years agoReport

      Trump Foundation was found guilty of illegal activity and fined $2,500 by the IRS.
      And is also being looked at for a similar illegal donation in Texas.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    So, you think it is worse to try to purchase influence, than it is to extort payments?

    In the pay-for-play game, one party has a fiduciary duty to the taxpayers, and the other just wants to get a word in edgewise. You seem to think it is fine for the public servants to extort payment in order to allow the common people to talk to them, and then get annoyed that a common person has the means to do so. Assuming that is even what happened in Florida, which is at best unclear at this moment.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 4 years ago

    I will TELL YOU when you can stand up, liberal - now resume the position!!!

    How it's FEELING right now, isn't it, son? Aww...sob!

    • Log in to reply to the answers
Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.