"Why do feminists believe women deserve so many advantages?"
Because feminists have cultivated this massive lie that the advantages they feel entitled to...are necessary for there to be actual equality.
I was watching an Australian feminist on YouTube say something like "for there to be true equality, there needs to be some give and take by both men and women," and the thought that I was left with was...when's the last time you EVER heard a feminist encourage women to do anything but TAKE?
And I listened to her drone on in the video where she made that statement, and not ONCE did she suggest that women should give ANYTHING or that men had the right to take ANYTHING.
But she happily chimed that if women are underrepresented in any industry, men should do the right thing and "give up their power" for the sake of equality. Of course she didn't reciprocate when it came to industries where men are underrepresented.
"Feminists don't believe women deserve advantages - just REAL fairness."
And what would you know about "REAL fairness" when you support domestic violence shelters that are PUBLICLY FUNDED turning away male victims of domestic violence...and shaming the notion that abused men may be afraid of violent female partners?
"It's anti-feminists that pretend feminists believe this to promote misunderstanding of feminism and promote more discrimination against women and hate for any women that speak out wanting fairness."
That's funny because I can't think of a single feminist conference where anti-feminists crashed, harassed or disrupted it...whilst conferences talking about men's issues have been treated that way with alarming regularity. Of course you want to paint a picture here of the oppressive anti-feminist, but your ideology is the one with the stains of censorship all over its hands!
"The problem is that anti-feminists do NOT really want fairness..."
Hmmm...that's funny because when I watched that video with Roosh V (who I'm not a fan of, to be perfectly honest) in Montreal, I didn't see a man harassing women...but I saw a group of women and their white knights assault and then stalk and harass him. But hey...it's about fairness, right? Women can throw drinks in a man's face, the bouncers then throw HIM out, while they follow him down the street to shame and harass him...and that's fairness in your opinion? Because he said something that people found offensive?
Meanwhile a woman who works for "The Guardian" gets to propose internment camps for men, including the ultimate objectification (ie. women can take the men they love out...like a library book as she put it)...yet she keeps her job, receives no criticism except from men's groups, and that's "fairness" in your opinion?
I think you've got a lot of nerve claiming anti-feminists don't want fairness considering YOUR track record when it comes to fairness!
"...they want most of the advantages to go to men as they do now so pretend anything done to help bring fairness is an advantage for women when they are the ones truly advantaged. It's all about deliberate blindness to the REAL discrimination that women face and attack on anything done to help make things fairer."
Most of the advantages currently go to men? Shorter life expectancies? More likely to die of terminal illness? Being more likely to be the victim of violence? More likely to be homeless? More likely to be incarcerated and when convicted of the same crime as a woman, more likely to be sentenced for considerably longer? More likely to commit suicide? Less likely to go to college? Less likely to graduate from high school? No post conception reproductive rights? Less likely to be provided with charitable or public assistance programs? Still openly discriminated against in areas of housing.
I mean you may want to represent male CEO's and politicians as proof of the advantage that men have all these advantages...but that's the problem with feminists: you like to pretend that the tiny minority of men who do well represents all men...when in fact the homeless in any given large city likely outnumber ALL of those men who actually wield power.
"I see you offer no examples just baseless accusations."
How is you suggesting that anti-feminists (many of whom are women) "want most of the advantages to go to men as they do now" any less baseless? Yet you make statements that are CLEARLY discriminatory against men...and you don't seem to understand why people have a problem with feminists??? REALLY???
"How is gaining equality "so many advantages", what's wrong can't you find a women who will be your slave?"
Good to see you acknowledge that women have gained equality. As for the second part of what you've said...why do you believe a man has to be a woman's slave in order for there to be what feminists would call "equality?"