(a million) do you prefer to be responsive to why people have faith untrue and incredible issues? (2) Or do you prefer to argue that the Bible is fiction? it extremely is a ways greater smart to be responsive to how people think of and procure schemas than to objective to instruct that any particular non secular propaganda is unquestionably fiction. interior the top, people will proceed to receive delusional schemas. as quickly as you recognize this, you would be responsive to why people have faith an needless to say fictional e book--no longer in basic terms the Bible, yet all such texts. in case you prefer to be responsive to, I propose you heavily take in cognitive, behavioral, and social psychology, quite because you have asked a query suitable to human habit. people act on what they think, no remember how unbelievable their ideals. an easier answer is: because of the fact they are stupid. people are in all probability the only kind of animal which will willingly die based on the perception that they'll stay continuously in another international by potential of the will of a few god in the event that they die attempting to exterminate people who don't think in that god. comparable cognitive schemas have led to plenty dying and suffering over the history of civilizations. whether or no longer the Bible is fiction, people have faith many stuff that are no longer authentic, and not continuously through lack of expertise. people have an innate propensity to evolve behaviorally and cognitively to their on the spot atmosphere, including video suggestions. How our brains have been given this way is an argument of evolutionary biology.