Even though you are most likely just another miserable troll, since everything you said is wrong. Unfortunately, some of the answers correcting your many errors also contain some errors. My dad was an engineer with Rocketdyne and helped develop the J-2 engine that powered the upper two stages of the Saturn V moon rocket, and I followed the program very closely, so I am very familiar with all of the areas he dealt with. Here we go: Who or what captured photographs of the moon landing if everyone was aboard Apollo 11? NOBODY PHOTOGRAPHED THE LANDING FROM THE MOON, THERE WAS A FILM MOVIE CAMERA MOUNTED INSIDE ONE OF THE LUNAR MODULE WINDOWS THAT SHOWED THE VIEW FROM INSIDE LOOKING DOWN AT THE LUNAR SURFACE AS THEY LANDED. THIS SAME CAMERA ALSO RECORDED ARMSTRONG DESCENDING THE LADDER AND TAKING HIS FIRST STEPS ON THE MOON. AS HE DESCENDED THE LADDER, HE PULLED A HANDLE THAT DEPLOYED A PLATFORM CALLED THE Modularized Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA), WHICH INCLUDED A BLACK AND WHITE TELEVISION CAMERA THAT RETURNED THOSE VIEWS OF ARMSTRONG STEPPING DOWN ONTO THE MOON THAT WE WATCHED THAT NIGHT. THE CAMERA WAS LATER REMOVED FROM THE MESA AND SET UP ON A TRIPOD, GIVING US VIEWS OF THE LUNAR MODULE AND THE ASTRONAUTS ACTIVITIES. During the landing of Apollo 11 on the moon July 20, 1969, there were photographs taken of the moon landing as the Apollo 11 touched down on the surface of the moon. My question is who or what took those photographs of Apollo 11 touching down on the surface of the moon if Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were aboard Apollo 11? Did they have a crew that already arrived on the moon before them? SEE MY FIRST ANSWER. NO SUCH PICTURES EXIST, OUTSIDE OF COMPUTER SIMULATIONS. If a camera was already on the lunar surface, what kept it from floating away? THE MOON HAS 1/6 OF THE EARTH'S GRAVITY, SO IT WOULD NOT HAVE FLOATED AWAY. How was the camera able to capture the moon landing if the moon is supposedly dark? THEY NEVER LANDED IN DARKNESS, THERE ACTUALLY WERE FAIRLY RIGID REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SUN ANGLE, TO INSURE THAT THERE WAS ADEQUATE ILLUMINATION FOR THE CREW TO PERFORM THE LANDING, AND AT THE SAME TIME THE SUN ANGLE WAS LOW ENOUGH TO GIVE SUFFICIENT SHADOWS THAT SURFACE FEATURES SUCH AS ROCKS AND CRATERS WERE EASILY VISIBLE. There are too many inconsistencies about the moon landing that don't make much sense. THERE ARE NO INCONSISTENCIES, JUST YOUR MONUMENTAL IGNORANCE. See the attached links for more information on these areas. General note to all: PLEASE look some of this stuff up before you blast a stupid question out here on yahoo. Remember, it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.