Can BOTH Christians and Atheists Try To Explain This?

If it takes 3 men 4 days to dig 5 holes, why did God make the dirt so heavy that 2 of the men needed hospital treatment for back problems but only one of those men was an atheist. Does this mean that God loves holes in the ground nearly as much as He loves the dirt that comes out of them? Please give as... show more If it takes 3 men 4 days to dig 5 holes, why did God make the dirt so heavy that 2 of the men needed hospital treatment for back problems but only one of those men was an atheist.

Does this mean that God loves holes in the ground nearly as much as He loves the dirt that comes out of them?

Please give as many Biblical references as possible to support your answers.
Update: Skeptics take pride in their use of intellect but not necessarily in their intellectual ability. Skeptics have beliefs but beliefs are predicated on the soundness of empirical evidence. Only naive and gullible fools think everything we believe is based upon logic and evidence. Psychological drivers cause us to... show more Skeptics take pride in their use of intellect but not necessarily in their intellectual ability. Skeptics have beliefs but beliefs are predicated on the soundness of empirical evidence.

Only naive and gullible fools think everything we believe is based upon logic and evidence. Psychological drivers cause us to pervert evidence and logic into agreeing with what we want to be believe.

Skeptics believe there is no rational basis for belief in that without or in defiance of empirical evidence - such belief is just ignored and dismissed as baseless.

Observational evidence does NOT indicate the universe has an observationally undetected cause - stating that it does just shows your fundamental ignorance about science and philosophy.

The strong atheist makes no claim that the universe has to have a naturalistic cause so your conclusion is unwarranted nonsense arising from your fundamental ignorance.

You are out of your depth by an order of magnitude beyond your comprehension.
Update 2: Deb D Skeptics take pride in their use of intellect but not necessarily in their intellectual ability. Skeptics have beliefs but beliefs are predicated on the soundness of empirical evidence. Only naive and gullible fools think everything we believe is based upon logic and evidence. Psychological drivers cause... show more Deb D
Skeptics take pride in their use of intellect but not necessarily in their intellectual ability. Skeptics have beliefs but beliefs are predicated on the soundness of empirical evidence.

Only naive and gullible fools think everything we believe is based upon logic and evidence. Psychological drivers cause us to pervert evidence and logic into agreeing with what we want to be believe.

Skeptics believe there is no rational basis for belief in that without or in defiance of empirical evidence - such belief is just ignored and dismissed as baseless.

Observational evidence does NOT indicate the universe has an observationally undetected cause - stating that it does just shows your fundamental ignorance about science and philosophy.

The strong atheist makes no claim that the universe has to have a naturalistic cause so your conclusion is unwarranted nonsense arising from your fundamental ignorance.

You are out of your depth by an order of magnitude beyond your comprehension.
12 answers 12