• You like mountain dew?

    22 answers · Other - Environment · 2 days ago
  • When is Global Warming going to start again?

    When is Global Warming going to start again?

    Three consecutive “Beasts From The East” caused by super-cold Arctic air have resulted in 48,000 non-heat-related deaths in the UK alone, as the 2017/18 Northern Hemisphere mega-winter rages on well into spring. Record cold and snowfall events in the Northern America, Asia, abnormal cold/snow in Japan, Southeast... show more
    Three consecutive “Beasts From The East” caused by super-cold Arctic air have resulted in 48,000 non-heat-related deaths in the UK alone, as the 2017/18 Northern Hemisphere mega-winter rages on well into spring. Record cold and snowfall events in the Northern America, Asia, abnormal cold/snow in Japan, Southeast Asia, Italy, Morocco, Sahara desert the list goes on. All this has been predicted by true climate scientists, who forecast an even harsher winter for 2018/19.
    20 answers · Global Warming · 2 days ago
  • Is there any reason to believe that the warming has slowed, stopped, or that a cooling trend has started?

    On what evidence do you base your view?
    On what evidence do you base your view?
    14 answers · Global Warming · 2 days ago
  • Would any climate scientists lose their job if there was no global warming?

    Best answer: Congress has blocked all attempts to impose a carbon tax for the last 20 years. If stopping carbon taxes didn't put them out of work, neither would a lack of warming. They need to produce weather reports and to be able to determine what crops to grow, where.
    Best answer: Congress has blocked all attempts to impose a carbon tax for the last 20 years. If stopping carbon taxes didn't put them out of work, neither would a lack of warming. They need to produce weather reports and to be able to determine what crops to grow, where.
    27 answers · Global Warming · 4 days ago
  • Why would it be a bad thing if, somehow, it could be shown that humans are not causing Earth to warm?

    Best answer: That conclusion would ignore centuries of science, but as a thought exercise the answer would be; No, it would not be a bad thing. We would simply refocus on moving our infrastructure to higher ground and come up with a plan to cope with the influx of climate refugees, instead of trying to prevent the worst... show more
    Best answer: That conclusion would ignore centuries of science, but as a thought exercise the answer would be; No, it would not be a bad thing. We would simply refocus on moving our infrastructure to higher ground and come up with a plan to cope with the influx of climate refugees, instead of trying to prevent the worst effects, by severely reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

    But this is not the way deniers deal with it, they have been claiming that switching to renewable energy is crazy, a bit like jumping of a roof. A thought process so illogical that normal people have a hard time following it.

    "If we jump off this roof, it's hard to imagine how much damage would be done to us"!
    (we could take the stairs)

    "I can't believe you're suggesting we just jump off this roof!"
    (Nobody is suggesting that- there's an elevator right over there)

    "Why are you people so unrealistic! Jumping off this roof is such a stupid idea"
    (there's an escalator the next floor down. We could use that)

    "I cannot understand why you people are insisting we jump off this roof!"
    (you're literally standing next to a fire escape).
    10 answers · Global Warming · 1 day ago
  • Are Republicans more persuasive than scientists on global warming?

    Best answer: No, it is true scientists who are getting the upper hand, finally. Maybe it is that those who are more intelligent can see the scam no matter what their political affiliation is. Quote by Will Happer, Princeton University physicist, former Director of Energy Research at the Department of Energy: “I had the... show more
    Best answer: No, it is true scientists who are getting the upper hand, finally. Maybe it is that those who are more intelligent can see the scam no matter what their political affiliation is.

    Quote by Will Happer, Princeton University physicist, former Director of Energy Research at the Department of Energy: “I had the privilege of being fired by Al Gore, since I refused to go along with his alarmism....I have spent a long research career studying physics that is closely related to the greenhouse effect....Fears about man-made global warming are unwarranted and are not based on good science. The earth's climate is changing now, as it always has. There is no evidence that the changes differ in any qualitative way from those of the past.”

    Now do you see any party affiliation with Happer? But we do know Al Gore's party affiliation. So are we to assume that Al Gore is the scientist and Will Happer is the politician? If you ever saw Happer, you would know that he is not a great orator. He is not very good at presenting science to the public. But he is great at presenting logic and facts.

    Quote by Al Gore, former U.S. vice president, and large CO2 producer: "I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis."

    So now you see what side of the issue Al Gore is on. And notice he is an admitted liar. If anyone would listen to what he says it would be due to lack of intelligence rather than party affiliation. And look what so called scientists agree with Gore. Bill Nye, a failed low level Mechanical Engineer. Jimmy Hansen who has been caught corrupting figures. That is definitely NOT real science.

    So the question is not a legitimate one. It supposedly pits party affiliation against non-partisan scientists. Ha! Ha! That is not happening in this question.

    A better question (and more truthful.) would be, "Who is more persuasive, crooked scam artists and ignorant people on one side or intelligent people and true scientists on the other side?"
    15 answers · Global Warming · 4 days ago
  • Could we pile hundreds of millions of tonnes of c-4 in strategic spots around the globe and blow it up so the fallout cools off the world?

    Best answer: That just makes more problems. It's no solution at all.
    Best answer: That just makes more problems. It's no solution at all.
    9 answers · Global Warming · 1 day ago
  • Why would Michael Bloomberg write a $4.5m cheque to cover US commitment to Paris climate agreement if AGW is all a liberal hoax?

    'Michael Bloomberg 'to write $4.5m cheque to cover US commitment to Paris climate agreement' https://www.independent.co.uk/environmen...
    'Michael Bloomberg 'to write $4.5m cheque to cover US commitment to Paris climate agreement' https://www.independent.co.uk/environmen...
    7 answers · Global Warming · 14 hours ago
  • How long before winter vanishes because of global warming?

    Best answer: Well, I think there is no doubt that we are seeing some very unusual changes ... Of course, no one can argue that a specific warmer-than-usual winter is evidence of climate change, but in Alaska this recent event is certainly part of a trend that's been happening for decades now. In my own part of the world,... show more
    Best answer: Well, I think there is no doubt that we are seeing some very unusual changes ...

    Of course, no one can argue that a specific warmer-than-usual winter is evidence of climate change, but in Alaska this recent event is certainly part of a trend that's been happening for decades now.

    In my own part of the world, Ireland and the UK had one of the worst winters for snow fall. We re now experiencing some of the warmest temperatures in April.

    Now, I think this is exactly the sort of weirding of weather that climatologists have been warning us about. And although we can't look at specific events as proof of our changing climate, eventually the number of weird outliers might be sufficient to statistically prove it ...
    9 answers · Global Warming · 3 days ago
  • What ever happened to all those children that wouldn't know what snow was by 2014?

    What ever happened to all those children that wouldn't know what snow was by 2014?

    Best answer: The Alarmists are the new "deniers" as Global Cooling takes hold. This past winter in the Northern Hemisphere has brought record cold, record snowfall and cold related deaths. The winter of 2018 - 19 is predicted to be the same and even worse in some areas, with the same for the Southern Hemisphere.. AGW... show more
    Best answer: The Alarmists are the new "deniers" as Global Cooling takes hold. This past winter in the Northern Hemisphere has brought record cold, record snowfall and cold related deaths. The winter of 2018 - 19 is predicted to be the same and even worse in some areas, with the same for the Southern Hemisphere..

    AGW is dead. Nature cannot be fooled, humans have no control over the planet's climate, CO2 is not a factor, not a pollutant, is vital for all life on Earth, the Sun is the boss, all hail the Sun...
    10 answers · Global Warming · 4 days ago
  • Why do global warming deniers act as if Obama is still in power?

    Best answer: As expected, no one has a clear answer. US scientists continue to publish research showing that AGW is a problem even with a vehemently contrarian administration. The scientists are not being coerced by the government. The end. Not that it was ever a realistic hypothesis to anyone not sitting under a tin foil hat,... show more
    Best answer: As expected, no one has a clear answer. US scientists continue to publish research showing that AGW is a problem even with a vehemently contrarian administration. The scientists are not being coerced by the government. The end. Not that it was ever a realistic hypothesis to anyone not sitting under a tin foil hat, but now all avenues of that narrative have been undeniably shut down.
    18 answers · Global Warming · 6 days ago
  • Which is the most egregious action of climate scientists, hiding the decline, disappearing the Medieval Warm Period, or killing the pause?

    Best answer: None of the above. The lack of science and its replacement with politics is the issue. We know from the ClimateGate emails how "scientists" leant on journal editors or even got them replaced if they would not toe the line with their propaganda. We know some of the tricks they used to stifle replies from... show more
    Best answer: None of the above.

    The lack of science and its replacement with politics is the issue. We know from the ClimateGate emails how "scientists" leant on journal editors or even got them replaced if they would not toe the line with their propaganda. We know some of the tricks they used to stifle replies from other scientists. (E.g. collude with the journal so that a sceptical article is delayed until you can whip us a convincing sounding rebuttal then publish both consecutively thus indicating that the rebuttal was obvious. This has the advantage that if you respond to the rebuttal then those authors will get the last word.)

    We have seen how some claim that the "science is settled". That is b*ll*cks - to use a technical term. It certainly is not science. We are still not sure about gravity - do we need dark matter or not?

    Then we have the groupthink. How the data is constantly being refined as time passes and every "refinement" results in a greater warming slope. Then we have the newspeak. Does "climate change" mean any change in climate or just man-made ones? If it means just anthropogenic climate change then what do you call the combination of both man-made and non-manmade climate change?

    All this based on such a shortage of data. If you plot the world's temperature on two sheets of paper (A4/Letter Size) then the last tenth of a millimetre - the thickness f the paper - represents a million years. So, you look at the last one thousandth of that then put a line through the points. How close to reality is that going to be?
    18 answers · Global Warming · 1 week ago
  • People realize cheetahs are going extinct in their destroyed natural habitats, right? Anyone?

    Best answer: Sadly, yes, that is true. So are many other species due to human's ignorance and greed.
    Best answer: Sadly, yes, that is true. So are many other species due to human's ignorance and greed.
    6 answers · Green Living · 4 days ago
  • What so you do when your court appointed attorney does not respond to client calls? Or requests after conviction , but before sentencing?

    Best answer: What can you do? Nothing. It doesn't make much difference anyway. Lawyers don't sentence the one convicted. The judge does.
    Best answer: What can you do? Nothing. It doesn't make much difference anyway. Lawyers don't sentence the one convicted. The judge does.
    4 answers · Other - Environment · 2 days ago
  • How much will gas prices rise when carbon taxes are implement to fight global warming?

    Best answer: As high as they can make it without shutting down the economy. You can see it right now. We, in the US, are pumping oil at record rates. But the Syrian situation is causing panic in rising prices. Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! We don't need the Middle East's stinking oil. We are again the world's largest exporter of... show more
    Best answer: As high as they can make it without shutting down the economy. You can see it right now. We, in the US, are pumping oil at record rates. But the Syrian situation is causing panic in rising prices. Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! We don't need the Middle East's stinking oil. We are again the world's largest exporter of oil. These guys are as phony as a three dollar bill, and they expect us to eat their lies like Cheerios.
    16 answers · Global Warming · 1 week ago
  • What's our agenda again?

    Best answer: The short answer would be "something like North Korea". But scratch the surface a bit and I think you realize they clearly do not go far enough. Many of their people still have access to luxury goods like smartphones, not to mention electricity and enough to eat. The agenda that I, and I think most... show more
    Best answer: The short answer would be "something like North Korea". But scratch the surface a bit and I think you realize they clearly do not go far enough. Many of their people still have access to luxury goods like smartphones, not to mention electricity and enough to eat.

    The agenda that I, and I think most people really have -- an ideal had since we were children imagining our futures -- is of course much more beautiful. It is with so much fondness that we dream of the day when no more than a dozen or so elites have 100% of power, wealth, and pleasure. And I, and everyone I know, has pretty much nothing -- toiling away in tedious manual labor without so much as a t-shirt to our names, breaking our backs for the pure benefit of some elite strangers I've never met. I seriously cannot WAIT for this -- I mean it's just a natural goal, a fundamental human instinct, isn't it? Because what other possible justification could there be for my tendency to trust decades of careful, expert research while reserving a bit of skepticism for the validity of some YouTube videos or parroted, empty talking points. It's all for the agenda!
    17 answers · Global Warming · 1 week ago
  • How much is fire from agricultural waste causing global warming?

    a) more than CO2 b) less than CO2 I you have a link, please can you share it?
    a) more than CO2 b) less than CO2 I you have a link, please can you share it?
    11 answers · Global Warming · 1 week ago
  • Paying for climate change?

    The dramatic annual loss of fast-ice in Antarctica is alarming environmentalists worldwide. The cause cannot be traced directly to any particular country or group of countries; it is a “collective action problem,” that is, the combined effects of our individual activities seems to be causing this problem. If that... show more
    The dramatic annual loss of fast-ice in Antarctica is alarming environmentalists worldwide. The cause cannot be traced directly to any particular country or group of countries; it is a “collective action problem,” that is, the combined effects of our individual activities seems to be causing this problem. If that is right, how could we determine who should bear the costs of reversing the warming trend?
    10 answers · Global Warming · 1 week ago