Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and, as of 20 April 2021 (Eastern Time), the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
- All categories
- Environment
Discover
- 127Upvotes of all answers to this question
Has Susan Crockford published ANY peer-reviewed research on polar bears in the last 10 years?
I went on Google Scholar and tried to find some, but the only thing that even looked like a journal publication was something about dogs. Maybe she should tell us about whether the dog population is increasing or decreasing.
17 AnswersGlobal Warming5 hours ago - 18Upvotes of all answers to this question
- 74Upvotes of all answers to this question
- 42Upvotes of all answers to this question
- 39Upvotes of all answers to this question
Should we stop using the term climate change?
Favourite answer:That's their choice, Personally, I think of anthropogenic climate change as being a slow-burning emergency, but that doesn't mean I think we should drop the term "climate change."
10 AnswersGlobal Warming2 days ago - 120Upvotes of all answers to this question
How do global warming deniers explain this plot?
The warming follows the logarithm of CO2 concentration, as expected, and the natural variability can be rejected as the cause of the warming at greater than a 99% level of significance.
12 AnswersGlobal Warming3 days ago - 26Upvotes of all answers to this question
- 119Upvotes of all answers to this question
Will global warming go down as one of mankind's greatest hoaxes?
The undeniable fact is that “carbon dioxide” is NOT a “pollutant” but an absolutely vital trace gas in the Earth’s atmosphere, currently at around 0.004% of all its components. Nitrogen and Oxygen make up 99%, with the so-called greenhouse gases making up the remaining 1% of which CO2 is 0.04%.
Every climate model predictions have been WRONG. The alarmist climate science has not made it through the scientific method and is thus pseudoscience, backed by government consensus.
CO2 does not trap heat then recycle it to the surface, with repeated cycles called the “back radiation” loop, the key component of the anthropogenic global warming theory or as I call it hunch. This violates the 1st and 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, the 1st law deals with the conservation of energy, with the back radiation loop being identified as a “perpetual motion engine” which violates this 1st law. The 2nd law deals with “heat only transfers from a warm object a cool object”. At the top of the atmosphere it is about -50 degrees C, with hardly any air pressure, there is no energy source to enable this rarified atmosphere to rotate down and reheat the surface of the Earth, this procedure violates both the 1st and 2nd law of T, plus a cool object cannot warm a warm object. Does an ice cube heat up your cup of coffee?
23 AnswersGlobal Warming5 days ago - 30Upvotes of all answers to this question
Has global warming debunked capitalism?
15 AnswersGlobal Warming4 days ago - 25Upvotes of all answers to this question
Which requires more knowledge of science, freely discussing science, or calling everyone that discusses it a sock puppet or a paid alarmist?
By "freely discussing science", that does not mean posting a bunch of papers where you misconstrue what they say and block everyone that would point that out.
5 AnswersGlobal Warming14 hours ago - 54Upvotes of all answers to this question
Doesn’t this real world observation totally dismantle the AGW hypothesis and put it into the hall of shame?
How can this be happening under the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis at this time of the year? Average world temperatures according to UAH is at -0.01 and even NASA has admitted that the Earth is headed towards cooling. The alarmist hockey stick graph temps have moved sideways for twenty years now.
12 AnswersGlobal Warming4 days ago - 69Upvotes of all answers to this question
Do you think what drove The Yahoo Joker/Clown Crusher the most crazy about me was that I played by the rules and he didn't?
He had dozens of accounts, I didn't. He blocked people from answering his questions, I never did. He hid his personal information, but I always shared mine. I gave science-based answers and he never did. I think it really drove him crazy that I didn't cheat the way he did.
8 AnswersGlobal Warming3 days ago - 17Upvotes of all answers to this question
How does climate change cause Volcanic eruptions?
5 AnswersGlobal Warming24 hours ago - 45Upvotes of all answers to this question
What *won't* you miss about Yahoo Answers?
Favourite answer:I won't miss the pathological lies of Dirac and Georgie. Even now, Dirac is lying. But he got what he deserved and I loved seeing that.
22 AnswersGlobal Warming7 days ago - 28Upvotes of all answers to this question
Suggest me some eco-friendly waste management ideas?
6 AnswersGlobal Warming2 days ago - 26Upvotes of all answers to this question
Do some people think global warming is a hoax because they believe every word America's former president said is gospel truth?
Favourite answer:No, I don't think they disbelieve AGW because of Trump, I think that is one of the reason they are Trump supporters.
Modern conservatism is delusional conservatism, because it is based on believing conspiracies and rejecting objective evidence. That made Trump the ideal candidate for the delusional conservatives--they reject global warming even though there is massive evidence the planet is warming, they believe in election fraud even though there is no evidence for it. They believe cutting taxes will increase revenue and balance the budget even though there is 50 years of evidence that shows the opposite is true.
I give Christian Sinner credit for finding a NASA link that at least casts a little doubt on the water vapor feedback, but I wonder how old that link is? There is increasing evidence that water vapor in the atmosphere is increasing with temperature, as the relative humidity stays approximately constant. Also, I question who ever wrote the original link, because the connection between temperature and water vapor content of the atmosphere is obvious to even casual observers. We all notice the atmosphere being dry during the winter and humid during the summer, so that's pretty strong evidence.
I don't give him credit for the cartoon he includes with his answer, which is insulting and obnoxious. I don't know what Christian Sinner does, but if he has such a low opinion of the ethics of scientists, then my guess is that he's not an ethical person himself.
8 AnswersGlobal Warming3 days ago - 3Upvotes of all answers to this question
- 94Upvotes of all answers to this question
Do you worry about global chaos due to global warming and increased human population almost daily?
I think about it all the time. Global warming. Will we actually get it under control? Is it actually real? Will the world start dieing off someday in my life? What will happen when the earth heats up too much? We are gonna see problems like we never would have imagined. Billions of people will probably starve and people will be going crazy to survive. The ecosystem is already getting so messed up and you know I don't even have to go on about it
23 AnswersGlobal Warming1 week ago - 20Upvotes of all answers to this question
- 28Upvotes of all answers to this question
Who were the most annoying science denying Eco-Marxists in the fake agw section?
Dirac and his army of sock puppets (too many to list)
Hey Georgie
antarcticice (race baiter)
capital gentleman
linlyons
6 AnswersGlobal Warming4 days ago
