Germans are native to Germany. When we were fighting WW2 we were fighting the natives of some other land. But I know you don't care. What you care is to push your anti-white rethoric. Over the course of history the borders have changed many times. But it is only when white people defeated the unwhite native americans that you cry. You wish U.S general custer had lost the battle of little big horn. More proof of you are anti-american, anti-white scum

I know this is mostly to do with history but isn't it time to let all of that go? I have always heard things that English people are rude, selfish and arrogant when this is completely far from the truth. I visited England a few weeks ago and everyone I met were so kind and lovely. Many of them hate their government and sympathise with Scotland and Wales but I still hear of this anti English vibe from the SNP and from various countries overseas. I know that some English football fans act brash when abroad but that's just football. It doesn't mean that all English are like that and most of them aren't. I actually find the English in general to be very nice people. The same goes for the French. They are lovely people but again, get a very unfair reputation due to their history which none of them got involved in. But the English get a lot of hate. Why?

It’d seem like each block would have to be custom crafted to fit with the one before it.

Americans need to be proud of their history. They need to be proud of having defeating the natives just as they are proud to have won WW2. No difference. As a matter of fact, Germans are native to Germany, so by winning WW2 we were also defeating the natives of someplace else. Hypocrites

In the films the Nazis drag the Jewish children away kicking and screaming to be murdered and their parents just stand and do nothing. With all the money and political power why didn't the Jews launch a holy war against the Germans? Why didn't they commit terror attacks on the Nazis? The Jews could have overpowered the guards easily . Isn't it pathetic and cowardly how a few SS guards were able to lead entire trainloads of Jews to the furnaces without even a speck of resistance?

Best answer: I'd say 1860 - 1870 would certainly be among the worst. Terrible war followed by a terrible insurrection inappropriately labeled "Reconstruction." But 1910 - 1920 was near the worst as well, with another terrible war and a terrible flu pandemic that claimed close to 700,000 lives in the U.S. and reduced the life expectancy at the time by 12 years. Incidentally this year marks the 100 year anniversary of both events.

Note to those of you who proclaim that 2010 is the worst decade - you really are a special kind of stupid.

Best answer: True, if you include the the Aleutian Islands Campaign.

(unless lightning was the only way)

Best answer: No doubt he is talkin, high of itself, boastin, but that,s dreadful yeah.

Best answer: Were the Norman invasions of Britain and Ireland a good thing?

They did not unify England, Scotland and Wales. Edward I conquered Wales, and the Welsh didn't forgive that. One reason Wales was at least semi-content under Tudor rule was that the Tudors were partly Welsh. James VI of Scotland became James I of England in 1603. He never went back to Scotland. Ireland was conquered but never subdued (Or is it subdued but never conquered? Anyway, the Irish were never content under English rule. There was never unity beneath the surface there.)