Best answer: Abiogenesis - which is an unproven hypothesis

Best answer: DONT REMEMBER THAT at all but not like I care cuz GOD IS ABOVE ALL THAT AND HAS ALL POWER over everything!!

The race deniers have lost a lot of battles. When anthropologists discovered africans and non-africans have been separated for 70,000 years it was a pretty big blow. Before that they said skin color changed over the course of around 10,000 years. Only it was 70,000. That would've been bad in and of itself, but it became worse around 2007 when geneticists were able to sequence the human genome. And the first thing they found were different homologous clusters of DNA among different races. Now ancestry tests can tell you your exact race down to .01 of a percent. This one really hurt, because before there was "no biological basis in race, because I don't know what categories are, or the difference between coding and non-coding sequences are" - said the race deniers. But once we can accept that yes, evolution works in humans. Divergent evolution happened between polar bears and grizzly bears 70,000 years ago, which is almost the exact same duration non-africans & Africans have been geographically apart, until like the past 500 years or so. Now we're learning other languages and becoming more globalized, but before then they were more or less entirely separated groups. & if sociology is any guide, then Africans are not the most intelligent. Perhaps it's because of them evolving in a tropic biome for so long, which makes athleticism a much more important trait for natural pressures. In temperate biomes, alleles and genes linked to intelligence become more concentrated in that pop.

Be able to maneuver past opponents in tricky situations. Can the human eye be trained to see in slow mo

Best answer: h(t) = -16t^2 + v₀t + h₀

Where:

h = the height of the object at any given point in time (in ft)
t = time the object is in motion (in sec)
h₀ = the initial height (in ft)
v₀ = the initial velocity (in ft/sec)
If v₀ < 0, the object was propelled downward
v₀ = 0, the ball was dropped from rest with no initial velocity
v₀ > 0, the ball was propelled upward

So in this case we have:

h(t) = -16t^2 + 37t + 6

v₀ = 37 ft/sec
h₀ = 6 ft

The first derivative of position, h(t) in this case is the velocity:

v(t) = dh/dt = -32t + 37

v(3.2) = -32 * 3.2 + 37 = - 65.4 ft/sec => the negative sign is the direction of velocity which is downward

The above makes D) => the correct choice

however he ball will hit the ground when the height is zero we can find the time that takes place:

-16t^2 + 37t + 6 = 0
using the quadratic formula the approximated times are:
t ≈ - 0.15 , 2.5 sec => disregarding the negative time, thus the ball hits the ground at t = 2.5 sec, which means at t = 3.2 sec, the ball should be resting on the ground so there is either an error or we are missing some more information

Best answer: Impeachment is impossible as long as there's a Republican supermajority. By Trump's own words, he could shoot someone and his supporters will still remain loyal.

Best answer: The official name, in English, of our star is Sun (with a capital S). The word "sun" (small s) is a simile: a word used to describe things that are similar. Other stars that have planets are often called suns (small s), but in astronomy, we try to avoid the simile unless it is quite clear.
Our Sun's name, in Latin, is Sol. That is why we have the adjective solar, in English.
The Solar system (the system of planets around "Sol") is OUR planetary system. Other planetary planets (around other stars) are not solar systems (they are planetary systems or systems of planets).
The name of our Sun in Greek is Helios. That is why we talk of the heliographic system (the system describing the Sun as the centre).

The official name, in English, for our natural satellite is Moon (capital M). The word moon (small m) can be used as a simile for other objects that are similar. For example, the moons of Jupiter. However, in astronomy, the official word for these things is "satellite".
Moon's name in Latin is Luna; we have the adjective lunar, in English.

Our Galaxy's official name in English is (was) Galaxy - with a capital G. Other galaxies are given names that depend on the direction in which we see them from Earth (the Andromeda galaxy appears to be in the constellation called Andromeda), or on the shape of the galaxy (the Sombrero galaxy looks like... a sombrero), or the number it has in some official list (for example NGC-224, for the 224th galaxy listed in the New General Catalogue).
The Milky Way is a band of stars that makes up a part of our Galaxy. Calling our Galaxy the Milky Way galaxy (with or without a big G) is not wrong, but it is redundant (the word galaxy comes from a Greek word meaning "milky").

The problems started when an American astronomy magazine asked authors to use lower-case letters for the proper names of the Sun and the Moon, giving people the false impression that these things had no names.

Best answer: Because it doesn't meet the definition.

It always looked a bit odd compared to the others but for years it was the only one like it we knew. So it was classed as a planet. Then more started to be discovered further out so it was realised Pluto is just the closest of the Kuiper Belt objects. Now either all those are planets as well, or they're not and neither is Pluto. So the International Astronomical Union came up with a definition of a planet.

1. It orbits the Sun. Pluto does that.
2. It is in hydrostatic equilibrium - that is, it's big enough for its own gravity to have squashed it into as nearly a sphere as possible. That's true too.
3. It has "cleared its neighbourhood" - that is, it is the most dominant thing gravitationally in its orbit. Pluto fails this test because the most dominant thing in its orbit is Neptune. It crosses the orbit of Neptune and is in 3:2 orbital resonance with it - it orbits the Sun exactly twice for every three times Neptune orbits. This is the influence of Neptune's gravity.

So Pluto is not a planet. But it fits the first two parts so it's a dwarf planet.

So we have more room to get to Mars.

Are paperclips good conductors of electricity?

Best answer: The speed of sound in air is 343 m/s. During the first part of 1.5 seconds, the ball falls from the top to the bottom of the hole. During the second part of 1.5 second part of the 1.5 seconds, the sound rises from the bottom to the top of hole. Let t be the time the ball is falling and 1.5 – t be the time the sound is rising.

For the ball, d = ½ * 9.8 * t^2 = 4.9 * t^2
For sound, d = 343 * (1.5 – t) = 514.5 – 343 * t
These two distances are equal.

4.9 * t^2 = 514.5 – 343 * t
4.9 * t^2 + 343 * t – 514.5 = 0
t = [-343 ± √(343^2 – 4 * 4.9 * -514.5)] ÷ 9.8
t = [-343 ± √127,733.2] ÷ 9.8
t = [-343 + √127,733.2] ÷ 9.8

The time is approximately 1.47 seconds.

For the ball, d = 4.9 * (343 + √127,733.2] ÷ 9.8)^2
The distance is approximately 10.6 meters.

OR

d = 514.5 – 343 * (-343 + √127,733.2] ÷ 9.8)
The distance is approximately 10.6 meters.