• If global warming exists why is it so cold every where?

    I think global warming is just a political term used by radicals
    I think global warming is just a political term used by radicals
    16 answers · 20 hours ago
  • How does the state of global warming compare to what was predicted thirty years ago?

    Best answer: 28 years ago (1989), we had 10 years to act or the planet was... show more
    Best answer: 28 years ago (1989), we had 10 years to act or the planet was doomed.
    http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Arch...

    Twenty years ago (1999), James Hansen said "Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought."
    In the same link was see Arctic ice was melting at an alarming rate- in 1947.
    https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/spec...

    Ten years ago Hansen and company were sounding the alarm. Arctic ice was once again melting away to nothing. The only difference is this time we did it. Five years ago Hansen and company were explaining away the pause.
    https://judithcurry.com/2013/01/16/hanse...

    Of course climate scientists eventually got wise and tortured the numbers until they said there was no pause. Is it any wonder some of us are skeptical of the latest findings from climate scientists?
    14 answers · 3 days ago
  • Why do people think climate change is not real?

    Why do people think climate change is not real?

    There are more than enough evidence to prove that we are causing it, for example the increasing amount of CO2 in our atmosphere.
    There are more than enough evidence to prove that we are causing it, for example the increasing amount of CO2 in our atmosphere.
    19 answers · 4 days ago
  • Will the world be hotter day by day?

    11 answers · 3 days ago
  • Is it time to go nuclear in the fight against global warming?

    Best answer: The Sierra Club and Bernie Sanders are leftwing hacks and not concerned about the planet as much as they are concerned with pushing a leftist agenda. If we had enough nuclear plants, the left would focus on the problems with nuclear rather than CO2. It isn't that they care, it is that they seek destruction. ... show more
    Best answer: The Sierra Club and Bernie Sanders are leftwing hacks and not concerned about the planet as much as they are concerned with pushing a leftist agenda. If we had enough nuclear plants, the left would focus on the problems with nuclear rather than CO2. It isn't that they care, it is that they seek destruction. I know the ignorant useful idiots that post here will feel offended but it isn't a well hidden secret.

    There are many relatively safe nuclear technologies that could be built but trial lawyers and environmentalists like the Sierra Club make it too expensive. I hate using the word environmentalists because they typically aren't concerned about the environment. The only ones concerned about the environment are the gullible drones that donate to these organizations. They think they are donating to help the environment but in fact it is more about pushing leftist causes.
    12 answers · 3 days ago
  • To fight global warming, should pension funds and other investment companies divest from fossil fuel companies?

    Best answer: I read something last week, I will find it and link to it because I thought the author summed up the answer to your question perfectly. https://townhall.com/columnists/nicholaswaddy/2018/01/10/your-pension-isnt-safe-from-ny-governor-andrew-cuomo-n2432091 <<<<Recently, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo... show more
    Best answer: I read something last week, I will find it and link to it because I thought the author summed up the answer to your question perfectly.

    https://townhall.com/columnists/nicholas...

    <<<<Recently, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo unveiled a proposal that would take his fellow New Yorkers, i.e. his dutiful subjects, as he seems to think of us, deeper down the rabbit hole of leftist self-congratulation. He has voiced support for divesting the New York State Common Retirement Fund, directly affecting more than one million New Yorkers, from companies “with significant fossil fuel-related activities.” >>>

    I said something earlier today that was paraphrasing the writer but he said it better:
    <<<First, there is the obvious problem that the purpose of New York's pension system is not to trumpet the political virtuosity of the state's governor. It is rather to support New York's retired civil servants, police officers, and firefighters in their retirement years by investing the state's pension funds in a way that achieves diversification and a high rate of return. >>>

    They do invest trillions and they expect us to bail them out when they make idiotic decisions.
    10 answers · 3 days ago
  • Will electric cars to combat global warming produce more government surveillance?

    Best answer: It is a concern. I heard a talk show host today predict that in 10 years, they will forbid cars with drivers because they will interfere too much with driverless cars. I don't know if that is true but it got me to wonder how I would get my trusty 4x4 Ranger out into the wilderness. Having driverless cars... show more
    Best answer: It is a concern. I heard a talk show host today predict that in 10 years, they will forbid cars with drivers because they will interfere too much with driverless cars. I don't know if that is true but it got me to wonder how I would get my trusty 4x4 Ranger out into the wilderness. Having driverless cars might give governments possible control of people moving around. Controlling movement of people is something totalitarian governments are known for so I hope they proceed with caution and not allow the government too much control of it.
    10 answers · 3 days ago
  • Why do we keep ignoring the climate change issue?

    Best answer: We're destroying the Earth for future generations becaue greedy oil companies OWN our elected officials... and all for greedy profits. They mock climate change but won't discuss it with facts or research results, like conservationists, environmentalists and scientists have been doing for many DECADES.... show more
    Best answer: We're destroying the Earth for future generations becaue greedy oil companies OWN our elected officials... and all for greedy profits. They mock climate change but won't discuss it with facts or research results, like conservationists, environmentalists and scientists have been doing for many DECADES.

    Didn't certain aerosol propellants almost destroy our ozone layer? All manmade, as we're now doing with pollution and poisoning of our air, land and waterways. At first, aerosol producers mocked scientific research and findings... but took notice when satellite imaging proved them wrong and WE took immediate measures, as we MUST do with fossil fuel.

    What will our future generations inherit? HOW much air, land and water can we REALLY afford to continue destroying and poisoning?

    Because like it or not, that is how people are. we all are selfish enough to like the modern facilities that give us an easy life, and greedy enough not to want to give any of them up . Businesses too are tarred with the same brush . They are in business to make money, and if it means altering the environment a little (or in some cases a lot), then they are quite willing to persuade the government to alter the rules so that is doesn't apply to them. It never seems to dawn on them, or the government, that by ignoring the climate change issue, the day will arrive when the pollution is so vast that such processes which screw up the environment will no longer be required , because it will be impossible to live in such an atmosphere. Only then when it is too late will the reality dawn on them.
    20 answers · 5 days ago
  • Do global warmers support Bill De Blasio's announced suit by New York against five oil companies blaming them for Hurricane Sandy?

    Best answer: I imagine they would except that they might want to sue them first. De Blazz is just trying to gear up to run for president. The man is walking talking caricature of a wacko leftist. He is a menace to decency.
    Best answer: I imagine they would except that they might want to sue them first. De Blazz is just trying to gear up to run for president. The man is walking talking caricature of a wacko leftist. He is a menace to decency.
    11 answers · 4 days ago
  • Is NAACP correct that MLK's vision cannot be implemented without fighting global warming?

    Best answer: Global warming isn't a civil rights issue. It says more about what the NAACP is than it does about global warming. NAACP is first and foremost a very leftwing organization. Martin Luther King wanted a color blind society. I don't think MLK's vision fits very well with the modern left that likes to... show more
    Best answer: Global warming isn't a civil rights issue. It says more about what the NAACP is than it does about global warming. NAACP is first and foremost a very leftwing organization.
    Martin Luther King wanted a color blind society. I don't think MLK's vision fits very well with the modern left that likes to use him to push their agenda. I'm sure he would not have supported the identity politics that is so prevalent in Washington. Republicans are the party of Lincoln and fighting slavery. Democrats were the party of slavery, the party of Jim Crow, the party of Japanese internment, the party of Black Lives Matter and NAACP, all very divisive causes that don't promote civil rights but instead promote racial strife.

    <<<President Donald Trump's administration released a new batch of documents about John F. Kennedy's assassination Friday that included a secret FBI analysis that portrayed civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. in a harshly negative light. >>>
    http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/03/politics/m...
    That link is CNN, you know that right wing news outlet.
    I don't think Kennedy was necessarily a racist but he had to deal with a bunch of different factions of the Democrat party, many of which were still quite racist at the time. Democrat Senator Bird was probably KKK at that time.
    8 answers · 3 days ago
  • According to leftist "climate experts" a cold front is now a “wild temperature fluctuation” and a Nor’easter is now a “bomb cyclone.”?

    Best answer: Around the corner or soon to be disclosed is that CO2 promotes Global Cooling or is it already here???
    Best answer: Around the corner or soon to be disclosed is that CO2 promotes Global Cooling or is it already here???
    11 answers · 4 days ago
  • What are the scientific credentials of Wattsupwiththat?

    If it is a reliable source of honest information about climate science, why are there circa 10 questions a day here amounting to little more than quotes from pasted-in links to WUWT?
    If it is a reliable source of honest information about climate science, why are there circa 10 questions a day here amounting to little more than quotes from pasted-in links to WUWT?
    5 answers · 1 day ago
  • If CO2 traps heat, where are the “heat trapping” commercialized products?

    If CO2 traps heat, where are the “heat trapping” commercialized products?

    Best answer: Temperature is controlled by the mechanism behind the Ideal Gas Law PV = NRT P, N and R are constants over time at any particular location in the atmosphere, so the law boils down to two important atmospheric facts: 1. Temperature increases with pressure as you descend through the troposphere 2. Temperature at... show more
    Best answer: Temperature is controlled by the mechanism behind the Ideal Gas Law PV = NRT
    P, N and R are constants over time at any particular location in the atmosphere, so the law boils down to two important atmospheric facts:
    1. Temperature increases with pressure as you descend through the troposphere
    2. Temperature at any location in the troposphere is proportional to the height of the troposphere above it
    The bottom of the Grand Canyon is much warmer than the top, because the atmospheric pressure is higher at the bottom.
    The sun shines on the surface of the earth, which in turn emits longwave radiation. This LW radiation is absorbed by greenhouse gases in the troposphere, which maintain their warmth and keep the troposphere from collapsing. Without the energy coming from the sun and the greenhouse gases, the troposphere would shrink and the temperature would be quite cold. During the winter the troposphere does shrink and temperatures go down, because there is less LW radiation being absorbed by greenhouse gases in the troposphere during the winter.
    The surface of Venus is very hot because Venus has a tall, high pressure troposphere. It is not hot because of the high CO2 concentration. CO2 absorption saturates even at very low concentrations, so adding more CO2 has very little effect on temperature.
    10 answers · 4 days ago
  • Do you believe climate change is a hoax?

    Why? Why not?
    Why? Why not?
    25 answers · 7 days ago
  • Are the global warmers embracing military dictatorship with their calls to have the military convince the public global warming is a threat?

    Best answer: Sheldon Whitehouse and many other "leaders" want so called "deniers" thrown in prison. Google it.
    Best answer: Sheldon Whitehouse and many other "leaders" want so called "deniers" thrown in prison. Google it.
    8 answers · 4 days ago