• Did Democrats not mention global warming in their response to the State of the Union address because they are bought by Big Oil?

    Best answer: Democrats are bought off by Big Green, Big Unions, Big Government, Big Trial Lawyers, Big Tobacco, and Big Oil but that doesn't stop them from demonizing big tobacco and oil. They have so many people to pay back that it is hard to mention them all and I think just forgot about Big AGW.
    Best answer: Democrats are bought off by Big Green, Big Unions, Big Government, Big Trial Lawyers, Big Tobacco, and Big Oil but that doesn't stop them from demonizing big tobacco and oil. They have so many people to pay back that it is hard to mention them all and I think just forgot about Big AGW.
    12 answers · Global Warming · 1 week ago
  • Is WattsUpWithThat owned by fossil fuel companies, as global warmers attest?

    Best answer: Alarmists obviously don't care much about facts. They tend to be the conspiratorial types that pretend to be experts in science which they confuse with with their politics. Anything that disagrees with their political outlook is against science and funded by the evil Koch brothers and or Big Oil. Since Watts... show more
    Best answer: Alarmists obviously don't care much about facts. They tend to be the conspiratorial types that pretend to be experts in science which they confuse with with their politics. Anything that disagrees with their political outlook is against science and funded by the evil Koch brothers and or Big Oil. Since Watts is often skeptical of their claims, he is said to be in the pocket of Big Oil. The stupidity of these kinds of claims disgusts me because I know my taxes help pay for that kind of stupidity.
    9 answers · Global Warming · 1 week ago
  • Should global warming skeptics be forbidden from donating to museums and other charitable causes?

    Best answer: <<<There is no reason to believe that another Ice Age won’t come. In the past, warm cycles lasted about 10,000 years, and it’s been that long since last cool period. Human-made pollutants may also have an effect on the Earth’s climatic cycles.”>>> You would have to be a real climate crackpot to... show more
    Best answer: <<<There is no reason to believe that another Ice Age won’t come. In the past, warm cycles lasted about 10,000 years, and it’s been that long since last cool period. Human-made pollutants may also have an effect on the Earth’s climatic cycles.”>>>

    You would have to be a real climate crackpot to disagree with that statement. Mann is a sloppy "scientist" and genuine climate crackpot but I would add to that that he is also a flat out liar.
    11 answers · Global Warming · 1 week ago
  • Is renewable energy hopeless in solving global warming?

    Best answer: Like so many things from the left, it is symbolism over substance. What matters is that you belong to the cause, and that you pledge your allegiance to Democrat Party (or similar if in other country). Chanting for renewable energy is like a religious ritual for a leftist that cleanses them and makes them feel... show more
    Best answer: Like so many things from the left, it is symbolism over substance. What matters is that you belong to the cause, and that you pledge your allegiance to Democrat Party (or similar if in other country). Chanting for renewable energy is like a religious ritual for a leftist that cleanses them and makes them feel superior. They are saving the planet. In the real world, we aren't going to stop people from using carbon based fuels into the foreseeable future. China, India, and the rest of the developing world want a good life and to get it, it is important to have inexpensive energy. I certainly don't mind development of renewable energy but I don't like the left trying to shove it down our throat without any consideration of cost and consequence. Renewable energy will likely eventually replace carbon based fuels but it is a pipe dream to think it is going to happen anytime soon.

    By exaggerating to ridiculous extremes, and crying wolf too many times, alarmists have shot themselves in the foot and they have no one to blame but themselves. In fact their feet look like Swiss Cheese.
    10 answers · Global Warming · 1 week ago
  • Should we start calling "abortion" clinics by the feminist term "parasite clinics"?

    Best answer: If aborting pregnancies is murder then your god would be the biggest murderer today by causing or not preventing miscarriages.
    Best answer: If aborting pregnancies is murder then your god would be the biggest murderer today by causing or not preventing miscarriages.
    4 answers · Conservation · 6 days ago
  • What happened to the hole in the ozone layer?

    Years ago, all environmentalists talked about was the hole in the ozone. Now we never hear about it. We only hear about global warming. It is like we get fascinated with the current trend in disasters. Is the ozone no longer a problem? Was all the ozone hype years ago wrong?
    Years ago, all environmentalists talked about was the hole in the ozone. Now we never hear about it. We only hear about global warming. It is like we get fascinated with the current trend in disasters. Is the ozone no longer a problem? Was all the ozone hype years ago wrong?
    18 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Why are people ignoring the fact that climate change is real and caused by humans?

    Fossil fuel is not infinite; when we exhaust the fossil oil, then what? We're destroying and killing wildlife and wildlife habitats, the first signal of what awaits us if we continue poisoning our air, lands and waterways. Oil spills of 30+ years ago are still polluting water and destroy wildlife, wildlife... show more
    Fossil fuel is not infinite; when we exhaust the fossil oil, then what? We're destroying and killing wildlife and wildlife habitats, the first signal of what awaits us if we continue poisoning our air, lands and waterways. Oil spills of 30+ years ago are still polluting water and destroy wildlife, wildlife habitats and flora, too. We're destroying the same Earth for future generations b/c greedy oil companies OWN our elected officials... and all for greedy profits. They mock climate change but won't discuss it with facts or research results, like conservationists, environmentalists and scientists have been doing for many DECADES. Didn't certain aerosol propellants almost destroy our ozone layer? All manmade, as we're now doing with pollution and poisoning of our air, land and waterways. At first, aerosol producers mocked scientific research and findings... but took notice when satellite imaging proved them wrong and WE took immediate measures, as we MUST do with fossil fuel. WHY aren't alternative methods being explored and properly funded? Because of demagoguery and greed for profits by a handful of rich oil companies (still getting billions every year from taxpayer coffers to further boost their profits, to satisfy their GREED but we cut funding for education and healthcare, Social Security). What will our future generations inherit? HOW much air, land and water can we REALLY afford to continue destroying and poisoning?
    14 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • How can anyone look at this graph and argue that it shows no warming?

    How can anyone look at this graph and argue that it shows no warming?

    Almost all the points on the left side of the graph are below the line, and almost all the points on the right side are above the line. The net trend is clearly about +0.016 degree C per year, exactly as predicted by the median IPCC models.
    Almost all the points on the left side of the graph are below the line, and almost all the points on the right side are above the line. The net trend is clearly about +0.016 degree C per year, exactly as predicted by the median IPCC models.
    16 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • What kind of weather would describe how you feel inside right now?

    Best answer: The most pleasant place in the world.
    Best answer: The most pleasant place in the world.
    10 answers · Other - Environment · 2 weeks ago
  • Have climate change predictions been right or wrong so far?

    I mean predictions from actual climate scientists, not predictions from tabloids, magazines or Al Gore.
    I mean predictions from actual climate scientists, not predictions from tabloids, magazines or Al Gore.
    17 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Did Democrats not mention global warming in their response to the State of the Union address because they are bought by Big Oil?

    Best answer: That makes as much sense as Democrat claims which is not at all. Democrats were really stupid and short sighted before Trump was elected. Since then, they have doubled down on stupid and they have become deranged. Hillary buys Russian collusion with a fake dossier so she can use the FBI to spy on Trump's... show more
    Best answer: That makes as much sense as Democrat claims which is not at all. Democrats were really stupid and short sighted before Trump was elected. Since then, they have doubled down on stupid and they have become deranged. Hillary buys Russian collusion with a fake dossier so she can use the FBI to spy on Trump's campaign and the drones run with the MSM diatribe about Trump Russia collusion. Unless the lili-livered Senate gets in the way, I think Comey clown, Hitlery and few others might actually see some justice heading their way. We will see. The swamp protects all swamp creatures.
    8 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Is the SCIENCE SETTLED?

    Best answer: Well 30 years ago they said doubling CO2 levels would cause the planet to war by about 1.5C-4.5C.
    In the latest report they said doubling CO2 levels would cause the planet to war by about 1.5C-4.5C.

    They tend to measure climate over a thirty year period...
    Best answer: Well 30 years ago they said doubling CO2 levels would cause the planet to war by about 1.5C-4.5C.
    In the latest report they said doubling CO2 levels would cause the planet to war by about 1.5C-4.5C.

    They tend to measure climate over a thirty year period...
    12 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Are global warming alarmists hyping polar bears suffering from global warming, when the real culprit is too much ice?

    Best answer: Too much, too little, too early, too late,....whatever is convenient to push their Cause. Interesting. It isn't the first time alarmists blame something completely unrelated to our CO2 on our CO2. You would be hard pressed to find a population of wild animals that don't struggle to survive. In periods... show more
    Best answer: Too much, too little, too early, too late,....whatever is convenient to push their Cause. Interesting. It isn't the first time alarmists blame something completely unrelated to our CO2 on our CO2.

    You would be hard pressed to find a population of wild animals that don't struggle to survive. In periods of cold, Snowy Owls for example have wildly fluctuating populations that are dependent on lemmings mostly. Polar Bears depend on availability of seals and also too much or too little ice will harm their chances of survival. If conditions aren't good, their numbers go down due to starvation. For a species like us that has food available anytime we want, it is hard to view the natural world without pity and a sense of sadness and a righteous indignation that something should be done and that is what alarmists want. They want to use a hungry polar bear as a poster child to tug at the heart strings to push an agenda that has nothing to do with saving polar bears. It is an agenda that has to do with getting more money and power to the state and these useful idiots think they are saving the planet. They are endangering the people and that is about all, all to further power of elitists in power.

    These ignorant useful idiots then go on Yahoo Answers parroting what the elitists tell them and they really think they understand science and that they are representing science. It is like you woke up in the twilight zone where drones were everywhere. It is bizarre.
    7 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Why are hedgehogs disappearing in England?

    Best answer: The Telegraph was blaming badgers for this ! I think it's more to do with declining habitat, though I doubt slug pellets are very helpful.
    Best answer: The Telegraph was blaming badgers for this ! I think it's more to do with declining habitat, though I doubt slug pellets are very helpful.
    6 answers · Conservation · 2 weeks ago
  • Where is the runaway Global Warming?

    Where is the runaway Global Warming?

    Best answer: There is 100 percent consensus among satellites which study Earth’s temperatures, 100 percent of them agree that Earth is not warming. By contrast, 100 percent of climate models are wrong. NASA has massively adjusted the past downwards since 1981 via station selection. This US temperature record is critical,... show more
    Best answer: There is 100 percent consensus among satellites which study Earth’s temperatures, 100 percent of them agree that Earth is not warming. By contrast, 100 percent of climate models are wrong.

    NASA has massively adjusted the past downwards since 1981 via station selection.

    This US temperature record is critical, because it is the only legitimate long-term historical temperature record covering a large area. The so called global temperature record is a farce.

    The situation is equivalent to having the same people act as player, coach, cheerleader, referee and scorekeeper. They are guaranteed to get the result they want.  The biggest scientific fraud in history.
    16 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Can anyone prove that 97 percent of the scientists support Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming?

    Best answer: https://www.forbes.com/sites/uhenergy/2016/12/14/fact-checking-the-97-consensus-on-anthropogenic-climate-change/#5d393f411576 There is no consensus of catastrophic warming, obviously. The consensus probably is that most scientists believe our CO2 PROBABLY adds to warming. That doesn't mean they agree it is... show more
    Best answer: https://www.forbes.com/sites/uhenergy/20...

    There is no consensus of catastrophic warming, obviously. The consensus probably is that most scientists believe our CO2 PROBABLY adds to warming. That doesn't mean they agree it is the PROBABLE primary factor. That doesn't mean it is necessarily catastrophic. It doesn't even mean that it is harmful overall. Alarmists are so busy pushing their leftist agenda, they couldn't give a rat's behind if they are harming the legacy of science. They do what the government bids them to do and think what the government tells them to think. It isn't a coincidence that the most controlled societies (e.g. Great Britain, Canada, Australia, Europe, New York, etc) are the ones that have the most alarmists. It isn't a coincidence that democrats believe in far greater numbers than conservatives. It isn't because they are more knowledgeable. It is because they are more gullible and more inclined to believe what they are told they should believe.
    7 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago