Well, first you have to understand that Harvey Weinstein and Willie Brown both were democrat gate keepers and controlled access for wannabees to the institutions of power. In the case of Brown, it was democrat politics and government, and in the case of Weinstein, it was the entertainment business. Both were pursued by women who would exchange sex for favors/advantages in their respective careers. But, after years of this, the democrat liberal women rebelled against Weinstein, but still adore Brown. Why? Well, it appears that the difference is that Weinstein reneged on his promises and Brown kept his. Weinstein went too far with too many promises to too many ladies. But, he also operated within a larger universe where more women make the offer. Thus, Weinstein failed because he misjudge his limitations and over estimated his capabilities, i.e. too much male ego, a common mistake of men. Brown, on the other hand was more selective and kept his promises. Or, to put it more plainly, took care of his girlfriends. The best example of this is Kamala Harris, the ascending democrat candidate for President of the US. She got her start as District Attorney by being Willie's girlfriend when he was mayor of San Francisco. With a 30 year age difference. So, what do liberals think about having a Presidential candidate who got her start by screwing the democrat boss while at the same time sending a democrat boss to jail for screwing the employees? Please answer.