Why do they not have an IMMEDIATE impact by killing them immediately?2 AnswersPolitics5 days ago
The Duke of Edinburgh's title is utterly worthless and will be rejected. But what are you going to do about it?
Jesus Christ would always refuse such a title, which is nothing more than a trick by Boris Johnson's political team, whose only purpose is to undermine God's long term foreign policy objective to destroy the British people and to have this Island invaded by the French Grande Army.
For the Original plan was to give the title to the Prince of Wales, or the Earl of Wessex.
But this is nothing more than a trick, or desperate bid by the Cabinet to prevent the ultimate GENOCIDE OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE.
Consequently, God would always refuse such a title. Because the question of Retribution is of the utmost priority (2 Thessalonians 1:8), and therefore the final destruction of the British people would always be the long term foreign policy objective of the Christ government at Versailles.
Ultimately, God's public refusal of this title would backfire against the UK government, which would be humiliation to the Establishment and to the British people.
But what are you going to do about it?Politics5 days ago
Occult literature will always find an audience. Because humans are naturally superstitious. True or false?
And all humans are naturally concerned about money, sex, power or revenge.
As such are the key themes that humans are naturally concerned about.
For belief in the supernatural itself is one thing, but whether or not the spells actually work is yet another thing.
Superstitious belief in magic doesn't mean that magic is actually real, nor does it imply that the spells actually work.
However, occult writers will often play on people's superstition, because it is clearly in their interest to sell as many books as possible.
Because it is clearly in their interest to make as much money as possible by playing on the superstitious mentality of the targeted audience.
Ultimately, any successful writer of the occult must be versed in the science of marketing (which is mostly psychological) and the art of hardselling the most popular themes, which are the key areas that all humans are naturally concerned about.
However, the successful marketing of such literature does not imply that "magic" itself is real, nor does it imply that the spells actually work (ie. money, sex, power or revenge).
Successful hardselling doesn't imply that "magic" itself is real, nor does it imply that the spells actually work.
True or false?
Religion isn't simply about a particular set of rules and ideas, but one must also consider the entire "baggage" that comes with it.
Because any religion can be judged by the end result, but if the results have caused more harm than any good, and if the real world situation contradicts your religion then you can safely assume or disregard the religion as being FAKE.
For the religion itself must be fake or useless if the plain language rules of the religion contradicts the real world situation, which is clearly observable to the "believer".
For such a religion is refuted or discredited by the real world situation, which contradicts the plain language rules of that religion.
True or false?2 AnswersPolitics1 week ago
Anti Witchcraft laws have been banned during the last 500 years due to the scientific advances of the Enlightenment. True or false?
Anti Witchcraft laws have long since been abolished by Western societies because the modern scientific paradigm has served to undermine the age old superstition that "Witchcraft is a deadly weapon, which can be used to kill people by occult methods".
Because the modern scientific paradigm has served to discredit Witchcraft as being a "deadly weapon which can be used to kill people by occult methods".
That was the key reason behind the abolition of Anti Witchcraft laws in Western societies during the last 500 years.
Because Witchcraft is no longer considered to be a "deadly weapon" by the scientific community, nor by the policy makers who have political power.
True or false?3 AnswersPolitics1 week ago
The central character, Liam Neeson seemed to exemplify the current status quo of "Anglo-Irish Supremacy", which is somehow recognized by the French.
Nevertheless, do we suppose that the actor's future successor in Taken 4, 5 & 6 should be a Frenchman in view of the fact that the Era of "Wasp ascendancy" will abruptly come to an end with the establishment of God's Kingdom, which will be French instead of Anglo-Saxon (Daniel 2:34, 35, 44, 7:14, 27)?
Is it a criminal offence not to have received your Vehicle Registration Certificate V5C for 12 months after you bought the vehicle?
Presupposing that you've already applied to have the Vehicle Registration Certificate (or logbook) at the time when the vehicle was purchased.
Is it an offence for the DVLA not to have sent you the new V5C?
- 1 AnswerPolitics1 week ago
Donald Trump's failed attempts to bring Jesus to the American people will really hurt his chances of re-election in Nov 2020. True or false?
Of course, I am really happy that Trump is going to get his butt kicked because the American people can actually see he had consistently failed to bring Jesus to the USA.
Trump's would be propaganda coup had ultimately backfired and he has landed flat on his face.
But of course, I am really pleased with the result and the fact that Trump is actually suffering beneath the outward facade of machismo.
So what are you going to do about it?
The appropriation of Wall Street, American assets and corporations must be worth trillions at least.
So, why settle for less when you could have Everything instead?
Rational behaviour will never settle for something less.
So much for the "spoils" of victory, which is concerning God and the first resurrection saints in Isaiah 53:12.
Ultimately, the appropriation of American assets, resources and property is sanctioned by the Almighty, but what are you going to do about it?2 AnswersReligion & Spirituality1 week ago
Justin, you have always assumed that God wanted to save your people from hell. But this is in contradiction with the Bible. True or false?
God does not want to save all people, because it contradicts the "vessels of destruction", which are "prepared (or predestined) for destruction", according to Romans 9:22.
Consequently, God does Not want to save the British people at all, because they are long since condemned to "destruction", according to verse 22, and according to your own words concerning the "divine defamation" of your people.
So, you are bound by what you have said, Justin.
Presupposing that you are a man of God you are still bound by what you have said, but there is no question of back peddling on this matter.
You need to get it through your thick skull that God has no intention to "save" your damned people, none whatsoever.
But you are presumptuous to even assume it.
To have assumed your entitlement to something, which you were never entitled to have.
But what are you going to do about it, Justin?
The Chinese government are worthless parasites who are too stupid to take "No" for an answer. True or false?
Because they keep asking God to be leader of their country (over Western civilisation) in order to make their country the global epicentre.
But they should just take "No" for an answer, because God doesn't like repeating himself for the sake of stupid ignorant people who have no understanding of God's character at all.
For as a nation, China itself is completely unworthy and racially inferior, which could never be the global epicentre.
True or false?3 AnswersPolitics3 weeks ago
Hostility towards America and the UK doesn't mean that God has rejected all the Western nations in favour of China.
Because such a presumption is utterly ridiculous.
Assuming that France never existed as a "third country" there would still be other Western nations who would be viable alternatives to America and the UK.
Ultimately, it was never a question of God choosing between France and China, but it is a case of choosing between China and Western civilisation as a whole.
Due to the existence of many Western nations (which are viable alternatives to the US and UK) God would always choose the white race (or any Western nation) over the CHINESE INFERIOR RACE, who are not suitable to establish God's Kingdom at all.
For the white race is far more beautiful than the CHINESE INTERIOR RACE who are hardly better than blacks in terms of their disgusting appearance.
That China will never be the global epicentre of political power and world civilisation was really never the fault of the French, but God is ultimately responsible for his predestination of Western civilisation to be dominant over China.
True or false?Politics3 weeks ago