Consider this article about the debate last night:
The article is supposed to be about how Obama won the debate, but the whole thing reads like a plea bargain for McCain... And completely ignores Gaffes that McCain made (like not knowing what General Petreaus' actual position is and referring to Obama as "that one"...)
"With no major gaffes, stumbles or snafus made by Sen. Barack Obama or Sen. John McCain during the second presidential debate, neither candidate won hands down."
"There were no fireworks, no major water cooler moments. Even though the debaters traded testy jabs over the economy, the Drudge Report went so far as to label the debate "boring." At first glance, it might seem this duel was a draw."
"This snoozefest created a winner only because no one won at all."
"The CBS poll did have a silver lining -- respondents still see McCain as more prepared for the job (83 percent to 58 percent)."
"Obama played it typically cautious and safe, and thus avoided major blunders, knowing if he commits NO ERRORS for the next 30 days, he will be the next president of the United States."
"The other good news for the Arizona senator: there is about a month left in the campaign. That's enough time for him to find the game-changer he is looking for."
Did you guys even WATCH the debate last night?
All McCain did was try to assail Obama with things that were flat-out lies... and Obama even got slight applause at one point, even though the audience was to remain silent.