It promotes violence and homophobia and is no better than Mein Kampf.

Favorite answer: I'm a police officer, I always reject ICE detainer requests because I have sympathy over these people, they cry and beg not to go back (Violence, gangs, corruption, rapists, in their former land). The US has crappy immigration laws that to come here legally equals you have to wait years, or even decades, to get the signal. These people don't have the time to wait, so I blame Congress for the crappy laws in place that need fixing. I would only honor the request if the undocumented alien is deemed dangerous for the country. However, if you pass the drug test and are deemed safe for the country, I would release you and reject the ICE detainer request.

I'm in my early twenties, never dated, and a kissless virgin. Honestly I can't imagine myself in a relationship. I don't know why but the thought of being in one just scares me shitless. Imagining myself as a housewife scares me even more. I can't imagine a life that mundane, a life so completely devoid of personal freedom.  To answer your question of why I have never dated, it's because I was controlled by a controlling mother all throughout those years. Now she has finally let me go and I just want to fly away to some island, live in a mud hut, eat coconuts, and never ever return. 

Why not just kill them on the spot?

Favorite answer: It’s political correct to do

Favorite answer: Anything before recorded history (about 2300 BC) is speculative and uses unproven assumptions to come up with dates. Truth does not need to hide behind unproven presuppositions (like materialism, naturalism). Atheists are assuming old age to prove old age; delusional, inconsistent, illogical and irrational to fabricate something then believe it to be factual w/o evidence.

Adopting an unproven (and arguably disproved) presupposition as an exclusionary priori prevents one from following the evidence where ever it leads thereby precluding science from being an honest search for the truth. If the scientific method is valid, it does not need priori's!

Evolution and the supporting myth of millions/billions of years are nothing more than a speculative ideas that have no basis in science.

We know we can't rely on science for ancient history. In 1963, a geologist counted 46 different theories for dinosaur extinctions by the scientific community, and many more have been added since then.

Probably only the cause of the Pleistocene ice age has generated as many bewildering theories. (As of 1968, there were 60 theories for the cause of the ice age). Science has never been the authority on history.

What were the ASSUMPTIONS used to come up with this 10,000 year old date? Oops, atheists don't confirm assumptions, just jump to conclusions from OPINION. This question ASSUMES some bone is how old? Anyone can assume anything they want, but to draw conclusions would be confusing reality with irrationality.

That men can speculate about the meaning of artifacts, including adding religious interpretations, has no bearing whatsoever on Christianity, or its actual history.

Favorite answer: Absolutely, and based on the continued STEEP reduction in the number of mass shootings and gun-related deaths in recent years, I think they're almost there!  Of course, they can't take all the credit, it was the strong bi-partisan support of Republicans particularly after the deaths of children at Newtown where they decided as parents & grandparents to tell the NRA enough was enough.  
But, ultimately, it would have never been possible for Democrats to do w/o the leadership of President Hillary Rodham Clinton. Without her Executive Order voiding Posse Comitatus & ordering the military's domestic involvement in the collection and simultaneous arrest of those in non-compliance and/or deemed by Democrats to be "militia members", it would NOT have been achievable from either a legal or logistical standpoint to remove approximately 100 million individual guns/firearms previously considered to be the private property of tax-paying citizens protected by a Constitution for which hundreds of thousands have died.  And, who could forget the peripheral economic benefit from taking away the guns such as the creation of thousands of high paying smelter jobs for illegal immigrants and convicted felons along with the thousands and thousands of tons of recycled steel which was; donated to 3rd world countries in Africa, used to construct safe foot bridges for easy access across the Rio Grande into Texas from Mexico, and to construct a monument in Washington D.C. in recognition of the Great Gun Take Away of Democrats.While there may be a handful of Democrats who want to "take away guns" and few more who don't think you need something that fires 100 rounds a second, it makes ZERO difference b/c it is impossible---absolutely impossible to do.  Both legally and logistically.  Think about the ridiculousness of my example and imagine the process of attempting the collecting of 100 million or whatever the actual number of individual firearms there are in the U.S.   Also, Second & possibly 4th amendment aside, Republicans, nor conservative/rural Democrats are NEVER EVER going to pass any policy restricting guns....period.  If children getting killed at Newtown didn't do it, nothing will.  Other than possibly even more and/or a greater frequency of mass shootings, nothing will ever change with guns.         

Favorite answer: Friday, I get to join my sewing club and create bright coloured things

Favorite answer: Just ignore them. Date who you want to date. It’s your life. Don’t let them control you.