Skip to search.
  1. Home >
  2. All Categories >
  3. Computers & Internet >
  4. Security >
  5. Resolved Question
Digital Love Digital Love
Member since:
01 October 2006
Total points:
679 (Level 2)

Resolved Question

Show me another »

Would you consider microsoft security essentials good protection for your pc compared to AVG antivirus?

Ed G by Ed G
A Top Contributor is someone who is knowledgeable in a particular category.
Member since:
10 November 2008
Total points:
87,359 (Level 7)
Badge Image:
A Top Contributor is someone who is knowledgeable in a particular category.

Best Answer - Chosen by Voters

Yes I would for two reasons. One Avg free does not offer rootkit protection and many threats use rootkits. This is not a issue if you are using Windows 7 64 bit. The other reason is Microsoft has a higher detection rate. But Avast and Avira both have higher detection rates than Microsoft. Microsoft proactive protection is higher than the other free choices, but it's overall detection rate isn't as good as Avira or Avast.
40% 2 Votes
  • 4 people rated this as good

There are currently no comments for this question.

Other Answers (8)

  • Sattamander by Sattaman...
    Member since:
    19 August 2009
    Total points:
    23,196 (Level 6)
    Just think for a minute, if Microsoft knew anything about security we would NOT need an anti virus and the LAST thing we need is for Microsoft to take over another market. If that happens then we all get the short end since you will be forced to buy their products or nothing.
    0% 0 Votes
  • Jim808 by Jim808
    Member since:
    18 June 2008
    Total points:
    4,932 (Level 4)
    Avg is good and quite easy to use and doesn't hog memory, it does have a download for root kit you run separate, As far as having a virus in your installation (were did you download from) I use Avg own web site or file hippo and have never had any problems. As far as MS own is concerned I never liked using it on a slower PC and It seemed to do a lot of feed back to MS etc..
    0% 0 Votes
    • 1 person rated this as good
  • mommy by mommy
    Member since:
    23 July 2008
    Total points:
    84,741 (Level 7)
    yes. to be microsoft windows are the best,and some are free.If you have the trial version of avg.when that expires you have to pay for it to stay on.With microsoft security essentials it lets you know when you have a versus and what should be done about it.
    0% 0 Votes
    • 1 person rated this as good
  • Dre' by Dre'
    Member since:
    14 May 2007
    Total points:
    10,017 (Level 6)
    yes by far, i've only used avg once and it killed it own processes and deleted itself when there was a virus in the installation folder.

    I don't want a anti-virus that kills itself and leave my pc unprotected
    0% 0 Votes
    • 2 people rated this as good
  • Giedrius M by Giedrius M
    Member since:
    25 June 2010
    Total points:
    16,091 (Level 6)
    I would say MSE is better than free AVG, but worser (according to tests) than AVG internet security.
    The reason is that AVG free lacks some detection components.
    20% 1 Vote
    • 2 people rated this as good
  • Gary by Gary
    Member since:
    15 January 2010
    Total points:
    234 (Level 1)
    its way better works in background and uses windows defender already built in common sence microsoft wants their computers virus free windows live one care had a few holes but essentials does not
    20% 1 Vote
    • 1 person rated this as good
  • Indigo by Indigo
    Member since:
    03 June 2006
    Total points:
    539 (Level 2)
    Microsoft Security Essentials is better free and it's not big
    20% 1 Vote
  • Anisa by Anisa
    Member since:
    10 August 2010
    Total points:
    680 (Level 2)
    its recommended
    0% 0 Votes
    • 1 person rated this as good

Answers International

Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. Click here for the Full Disclaimer.

Help us improve Yahoo! Answers. Tell us what you think.